PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFO vs. OCTQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFO vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MSFO

1D
-2.81%
1M
2.02%
YTD
-9.19%
6M
-7.90%
1Y
-4.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFO vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFO vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFO
MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFO vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFOOCTQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.37

MSFO vs. OCTQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFOOCTQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

Drawdowns

MSFO vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and OCTQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFOOCTQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.29%

0.00%

-29.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.79%

0.00%

-16.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

0.00%

-6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.16%

Volatility

MSFO vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFOOCTQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

0.00%

+21.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

0.00%

+19.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

0.00%

+19.78%

MSFO vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFO vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison

MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.67%, while OCTQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSFO
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
38.67%33.91%35.15%6.44%
OCTQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, OCTQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFO.

MSFO has the higher dividend yield at 38.67%, compared with 0.00% for OCTQ.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFO and 0.79% for OCTQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFO and OCTQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer