MSFO vs. GOOY
MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF) and GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while GOOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFO returned -3.86% vs 70.54% for GOOY. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MSFO charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOY.
Performance
MSFO vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than GOOY's 15.35% return.
MSFO
- 1D
- 4.63%
- 1M
- 20.78%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- -3.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.38%
GOOY
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 6.23%
- YTD
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 70.54%
- 3Y*
- 25.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.33M | $4.69M | $7.86M | |
| $1.07M | $907.81K | $1.05M |
MSFO vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF | 0.49% | 15.69% | 10.34% | 18.74% |
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 15.35% | 53.95% | 12.58% | -2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFO and GOOY is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2023 | 0.42 |
The correlation between MSFO and GOOY shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFO vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank
MSFO
GOOY
MSFO vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFO | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.48 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 4.01 | -4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 11.89 | -12.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFO vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, which is greater than GOOY's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and GOOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFO | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -24.40% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.65% | -17.70% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.92% | -7.22% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.46% | -6.46% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.15% | 5.95% | +10.20% |
Volatility
MSFO vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) has a higher volatility of 14.36% compared to YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) at 10.94%. This indicates that MSFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFO | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.36% | 10.94% | +3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.34% | 20.74% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.74% | 25.85% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 23.96% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 23.96% | -2.06% |
MSFO vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFO vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison
MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.78%, less than GOOY's 53.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 53.13% | 41.50% | 36.74% | 7.90% |
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF | 34.78% | 33.91% | 35.15% | 6.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFO and GOOY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFO has higher volatility (14.36%) compared to GOOY (10.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.65% vs GOOY's -24.40%.
On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 70.54% vs -3.86% for MSFO. On fees, GOOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 10.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 70.54% return vs -3.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for MSFO.
GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 53.13%, compared with 34.78% for MSFO.
MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while GOOY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for MSFO and 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFO and GOOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer