MSFL vs. DIG
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG).
MSFL and DIG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MSFL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Mar 15, 2024. DIG is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007.
Performance
MSFL vs. DIG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSFL vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF | -43.95% | 16.99% | -9.07% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 85.56% | 2.73% | -14.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFL achieves a -43.95% return, which is significantly lower than DIG's 85.56% return.
MSFL
- 1D
- 6.35%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- -43.95%
- 6M
- -52.20%
- 1Y
- -14.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIG
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 20.66%
- YTD
- 85.56%
- 6M
- 84.85%
- 1Y
- 61.85%
- 3Y*
- 23.97%
- 5Y*
- 36.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSFL vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MSFL vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank
MSFL
DIG
MSFL vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFL | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | 1.26 | -1.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | 1.68 | -1.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.25 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 1.85 | -2.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 3.79 | -4.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFL | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | 1.26 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 0.01 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFL and DIG is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
MSFL vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison
MSFL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.34% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
Drawdowns
MSFL vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -59.39%, smaller than the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and DIG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFL | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.39% | -97.04% | +37.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.39% | -35.40% | -23.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.32% | -45.64% | -10.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.41% | -64.48% | +45.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.60% | 17.30% | +6.30% |
Volatility
MSFL vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a higher volatility of 13.12% compared to ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) at 9.86%. This indicates that MSFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSFL | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.12% | 9.86% | +3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.15% | 27.64% | +11.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.83% | 49.37% | +3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.91% | 51.66% | -3.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.91% | 57.59% | -9.68% |