MSFI.L vs. GLDE.L
MSFI.L (IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP GBP) and GLDE.L (IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFI.L returned -17.69% vs 18.32% for GLDE.L. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GLDE.L.
Performance
MSFI.L vs. GLDE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFI.L achieves a -23.11% return, which is significantly lower than GLDE.L's -4.51% return.
MSFI.L
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- -23.11%
- 6M
- -21.41%
- 1Y
- -17.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDE.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -4.51%
- 6M
- -3.50%
- 1Y
- 18.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFI.L vs. GLDE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSFI.L IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP GBP | -23.11% | 3.55% | 6.56% |
GLDE.L IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP | -4.51% | 42.81% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFI.L and GLDE.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFI.L vs. GLDE.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSFI.L
GLDE.L
MSFI.L vs. GLDE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP GBP (MSFI.L) and IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFI.L | GLDE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.18 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 1.08 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 2.67 | -3.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFI.L | GLDE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 | 0.84 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | 1.21 | -1.61 |
Drawdowns
MSFI.L vs. GLDE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFI.L drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, which is greater than GLDE.L's maximum drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFI.L and GLDE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFI.L | GLDE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.29% | -16.85% | -17.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.29% | -16.85% | -17.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.42% | -16.57% | -13.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -3.34% | -8.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.96% | 6.85% | +11.11% |
Volatility
MSFI.L vs. GLDE.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP GBP (MSFI.L) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) at 4.83%. This indicates that MSFI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFI.L | GLDE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.90% | 4.83% | +4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.89% | 17.78% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.02% | 21.72% | +1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 18.50% | +4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 18.50% | +4.71% |
MSFI.L vs. GLDE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDE.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFI.L vs. GLDE.L - Dividend Comparison
MSFI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.47%, more than GLDE.L's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GLDE.L IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP | 4.67% | 4.82% | 0.38% |
MSFI.L IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP GBP | 9.47% | 6.96% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFI.L and GLDE.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDE.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDE.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MSFI.L.
Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MSFI.L and 0.35% for GLDE.L.
Find the right allocation for MSFI.L and GLDE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer