PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFI.L vs. JEPQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFI.L vs. JEPQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP GBP (MSFI.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSFI.L is traded in GBp, while JEPQ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JEPQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFI.L achieves a -23.11% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ.L's 9.19% return.


MSFI.L

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
-23.11%
6M
-21.41%
1Y
-17.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JEPQ.L

1D
-0.84%
1M
4.61%
YTD
9.19%
6M
9.47%
1Y
30.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFI.L vs. JEPQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSFI.L and JEPQ.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024

0.52

The correlation between MSFI.L and JEPQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFI.L vs. JEPQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFI.L
MSFI.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MSFI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ.L
JEPQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
JEPQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFI.L vs. JEPQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP GBP (MSFI.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFI.LJEPQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.46

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

5.39

-5.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

19.22

-20.20

MSFI.L vs. JEPQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFI.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the JEPQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFI.L and JEPQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFI.LJEPQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.77

2.44

-3.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.89

-1.29

Drawdowns

MSFI.L vs. JEPQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFI.L drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, which is greater than JEPQ.L's maximum drawdown of -22.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFI.L and JEPQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFI.LJEPQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.29%

-22.11%

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.29%

-5.57%

-28.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.42%

-0.84%

-29.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-4.77%

-6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.96%

1.56%

+16.40%

Volatility

MSFI.L vs. JEPQ.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP GBP (MSFI.L) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) at 2.85%. This indicates that MSFI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFI.LJEPQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.90%

2.85%

+6.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.89%

8.95%

+10.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.02%

12.29%

+10.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.21%

16.03%

+7.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.21%

16.03%

+7.18%

MSFI.L vs. JEPQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFI.L vs. JEPQ.L - Dividend Comparison

MSFI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.47%, less than JEPQ.L's 10.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSFI.L and JEPQ.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JEPQ.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JEPQ.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MSFI.L.

MSFI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ.L is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MSFI.L and 0.35% for JEPQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFI.L and JEPQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer