MSFD vs. NFXS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion. MSFD is passively managed, while NFXS is actively managed. Over the past year, MSFD returned 26.45% vs 64.26% for NFXS. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFD charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.

Performance

MSFD vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MSFD having a 24.19% return and NFXS slightly higher at 24.21%.

MSFD

• 1D: -3.08%
• 1M: 9.58%
• YTD: 24.19%
• 6M: 25.23%
• 1Y: 26.45%
• 3Y*: -3.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFXS

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 21.28%
• YTD: 24.21%
• 6M: 24.00%
• 1Y: 64.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFD vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares	24.19%	-13.36%	-0.61%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	24.21%	-8.56%	-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFD and NFXS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	0.35

Return for Risk

MSFD vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFD

MSFD Risk / Return Rank: 29
MSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
MSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 32
MSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 28

NFXS

NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 55
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFD vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFD	NFXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.91	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	2.55	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.36	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	2.06	-0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.69	5.64	-1.94

MSFD vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFD and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFD vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFD drawdown since its inception was -59.90%, which is greater than NFXS's maximum drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFD and NFXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFD	NFXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.90%	-50.37%	-9.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.25%	-31.31%	+8.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.99%	-12.88%	-31.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.61%	-31.93%	-9.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.35%	11.45%	-4.10%

Volatility

MSFD vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) at 7.74%. This indicates that MSFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFD	NFXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.74%	7.74%	+4.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.81%	26.22%	-3.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.33%	33.81%	-7.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.27%	34.65%	-8.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.27%	34.65%	-8.38%

MSFD vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFD vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than NFXS's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares	2.52%	3.33%	4.46%	4.43%	0.74%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	3.23%	3.53%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFD and NFXS in my portfolio?

MSFD and NFXS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFD or NFXS?

MSFD has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to NFXS (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFD dropped -59.90% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

Which ETF is better, MSFD or NFXS?

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 64.26% vs 26.45% for MSFD. On fees, NFXS is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, NFXS has been the lower-risk option at 7.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFD or NFXS?

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 64.26% return vs 26.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFD or NFXS?

NFXS is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFD or NFXS?

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 2.52% for MSFD.

What is the main difference between MSFD and NFXS?

Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MSFD and 1.03% for NFXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.