MSFAX vs. PRSCX
MSFAX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio) and PRSCX (T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund) are both mutual funds - MSFAX is a Global Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while PRSCX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, MSFAX returned 6.79%/yr vs 20.67%/yr for PRSCX. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MSFAX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for PRSCX.
Performance
MSFAX vs. PRSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFAX achieves a -5.83% return, which is significantly lower than PRSCX's 19.88% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFAX has underperformed PRSCX with an annualized return of 6.79%, while PRSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.67% annualized return.
MSFAX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- 6M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- -5.83%
- 1Y
- -20.48%
- 3Y*
- -2.17%
- 5Y*
- -1.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.11%
PRSCX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.59%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 1Y
- 38.59%
- 3Y*
- 29.43%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- 20.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MSFAX vs. PRSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFAX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio | -5.83% | -11.65% | 8.94% | 16.41% | -17.26% | 21.89% | 13.24% | 34.63% | -1.66% | 24.68% |
PRSCX T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund | 19.88% | 24.28% | 40.49% | 53.77% | -35.40% | 5.83% | 45.94% | 53.80% | -7.52% | 39.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFAX and PRSCX is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2001 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSFAX and PRSCX has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFAX vs. PRSCX — Risk / Return Rank
MSFAX
PRSCX
MSFAX vs. PRSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio (MSFAX) and T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFAX | PRSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.22 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 1.82 | -2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 5.29 | -6.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFAX vs. PRSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFAX drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, smaller than the maximum PRSCX drawdown of -85.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFAX and PRSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFAX | PRSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.81% | -85.26% | +41.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -20.17% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.89% | -31.06% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -46.19% | +12.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | -46.19% | +12.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.22% | -17.29% | -9.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -29.81% | +23.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.50% | 6.84% | +11.66% |
Volatility
MSFAX vs. PRSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio (MSFAX) is 4.89%, while T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that MSFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFAX | PRSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 9.75% | -4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 28.20% | -17.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 31.84% | -14.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 29.34% | -12.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 25.62% | -8.72% |
MSFAX vs. PRSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFAX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than PRSCX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFAX vs. PRSCX - Dividend Comparison
MSFAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFAX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.85% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 2.75% | 3.48% | 8.23% | 5.76% | 3.72% | 3.11% | 4.75% |
PRSCX T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund | 9.61% | 11.53% | 9.43% | 0.00% | 7.83% | 33.69% | 13.90% | 10.91% | 36.03% | 13.21% | 3.68% | 18.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFAX and PRSCX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRSCX has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to MSFAX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFAX dropped -43.81% vs PRSCX's -85.26%.
PRSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFAX and PRSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer