PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFAX vs. GLIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFAX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio (MSFAX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFAX achieves a -9.27% return, which is significantly lower than GLIFX's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFAX has underperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 6.50%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.


MSFAX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
-9.27%
6M
-19.53%
1Y
-25.03%
3Y*
-2.08%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
6.50%

GLIFX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
7.33%
6M
7.56%
1Y
15.45%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFAX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSFAX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio
-9.27%-11.65%8.94%16.41%-17.26%21.89%13.24%34.63%-1.66%24.68%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.33%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFAX and GLIFX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between MSFAX and GLIFX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFAX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFAX
MSFAX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
MSFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFAX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio (MSFAX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFAXGLIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.69

1.27

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

1.74

-2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.57

5.88

-7.45

MSFAX vs. GLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFAX Sharpe Ratio is -1.51, which is lower than the GLIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFAX and GLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFAXGLIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.51

1.46

-2.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

1.03

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.77

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.84

-0.24

Drawdowns

MSFAX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFAX drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFAX and GLIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFAXGLIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-29.65%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.00%

-9.00%

-21.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.89%

-10.02%

-23.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-17.15%

-16.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

-29.65%

-4.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.87%

-5.79%

-24.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-3.36%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.13%

2.66%

+13.47%

Volatility

MSFAX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio (MSFAX) is 2.87%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that MSFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFAXGLIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

4.53%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.01%

9.30%

+6.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

10.72%

+6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

10.99%

+5.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

13.33%

+3.59%

MSFAX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFAX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFAX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison

MSFAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
6.29%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%
MSFAX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio
0.00%0.00%11.85%1.96%1.69%2.75%3.48%8.23%5.76%3.72%3.11%4.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFAX and GLIFX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLIFX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to MSFAX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFAX dropped -43.81% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.

GLIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFAX and GLIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer