PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSEX vs. LEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSEX vs. LEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSEX achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than LEG's -10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MSEX has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 5.43%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -12.01% annualized return.


MSEX

1D
2.67%
1M
1.29%
6M
10.88%
YTD
15.19%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
-8.48%
5Y*
-9.05%
10Y*
5.43%
ALL TIME*
10.57%

LEG

1D
-2.20%
1M
-16.02%
6M
-15.21%
YTD
-10.05%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
-29.16%
5Y*
-24.27%
10Y*
-12.01%
ALL TIME*
6.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.50M$23.27M$28.03M
$6.97M$11.03M$8.63M

MSEX vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSEX
Middlesex Water Company
15.19%-1.65%-18.00%-15.19%-33.75%68.50%15.78%21.12%36.54%-4.92%
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
-10.05%17.02%-61.93%-13.45%-17.78%-3.76%-9.05%47.13%-22.25%0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between MSEX and LEG is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.22

The correlation between MSEX and LEG shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSEX:

$1.07B

LEG:

$1.34B

EPS

MSEX:

$3.49

LEG:

$1.60

PE Ratio

MSEX:

16.44

LEG:

6.13

PS Ratio

MSEX:

3.82

LEG:

0.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSEX:

$206.14M

LEG:

$3.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSEX:

$65.77M

LEG:

$717.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

MSEX:

$91.33M

LEG:

$433.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSEX vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSEX
MSEX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

LEG
LEG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
LEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSEX vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSEXLEGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.06

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

0.16

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

0.34

+0.82

MSEX vs. LEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the LEG Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSEX and LEG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSEX vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSEX drawdown since its inception was -60.51%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEX and LEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSEXLEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.51%

-86.41%

+25.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.04%

-28.51%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.09%

-76.68%

+33.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.51%

-84.29%

+23.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.51%

-86.41%

+25.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.81%

-79.20%

+31.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-19.84%

+6.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.11%

13.72%

-1.61%

Volatility

MSEX vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is 7.79%, while Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that MSEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSEXLEGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

11.32%

-3.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.68%

32.38%

-13.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.22%

49.36%

-19.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.45%

42.74%

-12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.33%

39.96%

-7.63%

Dividends

MSEX vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison

MSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than LEG's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
2.04%1.82%6.35%6.95%5.40%4.03%3.61%3.11%4.19%2.98%2.74%3.00%
MSEX
Middlesex Water Company
2.48%2.74%2.50%1.92%1.50%1.16%1.44%1.54%1.71%2.15%1.88%2.92%

Financials

MSEX vs. LEG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Middlesex Water Company and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MSEX and LEG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEG has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to MSEX (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSEX dropped -60.51% vs LEG's -86.41%.

MSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSEX and LEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer