PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSEQX vs. MEMEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSEQX vs. MEMEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (MEMEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSEQX achieves a -1.20% return, which is significantly lower than MEMEX's 35.86% return.


MSEQX

1D
-1.57%
1M
4.10%
YTD
-1.20%
6M
-2.94%
1Y
9.09%
3Y*
29.17%
5Y*
1.84%
10Y*
17.37%

MEMEX

1D
1.23%
1M
13.56%
YTD
35.86%
6M
39.67%
1Y
66.25%
3Y*
27.83%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSEQX vs. MEMEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
-1.20%24.78%46.65%50.36%-60.18%-0.00%115.60%38.25%5.38%30.52%
MEMEX
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
35.86%32.98%7.82%11.90%-25.14%2.99%14.40%19.61%-17.46%26.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MSEQX and MEMEX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.54

The correlation between MSEQX and MEMEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSEQX vs. MEMEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSEQX
MSEQX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MSEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MSEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

MEMEX
MEMEX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MEMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MEMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSEQX vs. MEMEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (MEMEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSEQXMEMEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.64

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

4.43

-4.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

18.92

-18.16

MSEQX vs. MEMEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSEQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the MEMEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSEQX and MEMEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSEQXMEMEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

3.42

-3.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.52

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.54

-0.07

Drawdowns

MSEQX vs. MEMEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSEQX drawdown since its inception was -69.48%, which is greater than MEMEX's maximum drawdown of -39.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEQX and MEMEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSEQXMEMEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.48%

-39.90%

-29.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.73%

-14.99%

-12.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.52%

-17.21%

-15.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.48%

-37.30%

-32.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.64%

0.00%

-13.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.89%

-15.05%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.82%

3.51%

+9.31%

Volatility

MSEQX vs. MEMEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) is 8.13%, while Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (MEMEX) has a volatility of 8.64%. This indicates that MSEQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEMEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSEQXMEMEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

8.64%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.32%

17.13%

+4.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.99%

19.46%

+8.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.71%

17.80%

+21.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.76%

18.30%

+15.46%

MSEQX vs. MEMEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSEQX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than MEMEX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSEQX vs. MEMEX - Dividend Comparison

MSEQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MEMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEMEX
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
2.47%3.35%1.38%3.26%13.18%0.86%2.57%7.81%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSEQX
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I
0.00%0.00%0.55%0.05%16.79%24.24%9.36%21.39%5.38%21.18%12.71%7.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSEQX and MEMEX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEMEX has higher volatility (8.64%) compared to MSEQX (8.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSEQX dropped -69.48% vs MEMEX's -39.90%.

MEMEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSEQX and MEMEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer