MSEQX vs. AMRGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX).
MSEQX is managed by Morgan Stanley. It was launched on Apr 2, 1991. AMRGX is managed by American Growth. It was launched on Jul 31, 1958.
Performance
MSEQX vs. AMRGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSEQX vs. AMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSEQX Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I | -15.37% | 24.78% | 46.65% | 50.36% | -60.18% | -0.00% | 115.60% | 38.25% | 5.38% | 43.91% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | 1.60% | 11.18% | 16.61% | 24.38% | -19.93% | 15.64% | 18.65% | 36.73% | -9.07% | 13.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSEQX achieves a -15.37% return, which is significantly lower than AMRGX's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MSEQX has outperformed AMRGX with an annualized return of 15.71%, while AMRGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return.
MSEQX
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- YTD
- -15.37%
- 6M
- -21.98%
- 1Y
- 15.92%
- 3Y*
- 25.56%
- 5Y*
- -1.63%
- 10Y*
- 15.71%
AMRGX
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -8.89%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 18.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSEQX vs. AMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSEQX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than AMRGX's 4.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MSEQX vs. AMRGX — Risk / Return Rank
MSEQX
AMRGX
MSEQX vs. AMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSEQX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.71 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 1.25 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.21 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 1.20 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.53 | 2.91 | -1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSEQX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.71 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.35 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.51 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.10 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSEQX and AMRGX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MSEQX vs. AMRGX - Dividend Comparison
MSEQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.54%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSEQX Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 16.79% | 24.24% | 9.36% | 21.39% | 5.38% | 21.18% | 12.71% | 7.55% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | 17.54% | 17.82% | 12.39% | 8.17% | 7.77% | 12.21% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MSEQX vs. AMRGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSEQX drawdown since its inception was -69.48%, smaller than the maximum AMRGX drawdown of -80.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEQX and AMRGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSEQX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.48% | -80.32% | +10.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.73% | -13.98% | -13.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.48% | -35.42% | -34.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.48% | -35.42% | -34.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.02% | -11.44% | -14.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.88% | -40.45% | +23.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.55% | 5.78% | +4.77% |
Volatility
MSEQX vs. AMRGX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) at 7.00%. This indicates that MSEQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSEQX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.47% | 7.00% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.11% | 23.66% | -1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.39% | 28.35% | +5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.78% | 21.88% | +17.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.59% | 21.32% | +12.27% |