MSEGX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MSEGX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MSEGX returned -3.06%/yr vs 12.19%/yr for FSPGX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MSEGX charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

MSEGX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSEGX achieves a -8.56% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 2.47% return.

MSEGX

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: -6.14%
• 6M: 2.08%
• YTD: -8.56%
• 1Y: -6.44%
• 3Y*: 22.63%
• 5Y*: -3.06%
• 10Y*: 15.45%
• ALL TIME*: 10.89%

FSPGX

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: -0.32%
• 6M: 5.57%
• YTD: 2.47%
• 1Y: 10.34%
• 3Y*: 21.32%
• 5Y*: 12.19%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MSEGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MSEGX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSEGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio	-8.56%	24.43%	46.29%	49.87%	-60.27%	-0.31%	115.11%	38.93%	5.01%	43.53%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	2.47%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MSEGX and FSPGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.78

The correlation between MSEGX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MSEGX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSEGX

MSEGX Risk / Return Rank: 3
MSEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MSEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MSEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MSEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MSEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 17
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSEGX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSEGX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	0.72	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	1.09	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.13	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	0.78	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.20	2.31	-2.51

MSEGX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSEGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSEGX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSEGX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSEGX drawdown since its inception was -69.57%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEGX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSEGX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.57%	-32.66%	-36.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.83%	-16.17%	-11.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.54%	-23.32%	-9.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.57%	-32.66%	-36.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.97%	-6.00%	-14.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.50%	-6.36%	-13.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.57%	5.42%	+9.15%

Volatility

MSEGX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 6.70%. This indicates that MSEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSEGX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.72%	6.70%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.82%	14.18%	+8.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.63%	17.56%	+12.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.95%	21.83%	+18.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.98%	21.58%	+12.40%

MSEGX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSEGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSEGX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

MSEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.38%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
MSEGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio	0.00%	0.00%	0.42%	0.00%	18.70%	26.52%	10.03%	22.75%	5.67%	22.18%	13.17%	7.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSEGX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

MSEGX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSEGX or FSPGX?

MSEGX has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to FSPGX (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSEGX dropped -69.57% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.