MSED.L vs. IMIB.L
MSED.L (Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C) and IMIB.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both Europe Equities funds - MSED.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while IMIB.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MSED.L returned 2.86%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for IMIB.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSED.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IMIB.L.
Performance
MSED.L vs. IMIB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSED.L achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than IMIB.L's 15.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MSED.L has underperformed IMIB.L with an annualized return of 2.86%, while IMIB.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.
MSED.L
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- 6M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 17.21%
- 3Y*
- -11.00%
- 5Y*
- -3.98%
- 10Y*
- 2.86%
IMIB.L
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- 6M
- 14.12%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- 32.64%
- 3Y*
- 26.97%
- 5Y*
- 21.06%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
MSED.L vs. IMIB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSED.L Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C | 7.24% | 27.89% | 6.38% | -45.01% | -3.26% | 15.48% | 3.29% | 21.79% | -11.28% | 15.48% |
IMIB.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 15.82% | 43.78% | 13.17% | 30.55% | -3.59% | 18.30% | 1.46% | 24.85% | -15.32% | 18.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSED.L and IMIB.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2013 | 0.84 |
The correlation between MSED.L and IMIB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
MSED.L vs. IMIB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSED.L
IMIB.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
MSED.L
IMIB.L
Industrials
MSED.L
IMIB.L
Technology
MSED.L
IMIB.L
Consumer Cyclical
MSED.L
IMIB.L
Healthcare
MSED.L
IMIB.L
Energy
MSED.L
IMIB.L
Utilities
MSED.L
IMIB.L
Consumer Defensive
MSED.L
IMIB.L
Communication Services
MSED.L
IMIB.L
Basic Materials
MSED.L
IMIB.L
Real Estate
MSED.L
-
IMIB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSED.L vs. IMIB.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSED.L
IMIB.L
MSED.L vs. IMIB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSED.L | IMIB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 3.16 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 11.23 | -6.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSED.L vs. IMIB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSED.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, smaller than the maximum IMIB.L drawdown of -70.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSED.L and IMIB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSED.L | IMIB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -70.29% | +12.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -10.28% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.05% | -15.58% | -42.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.05% | -24.06% | -33.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.05% | -36.68% | -21.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.10% | -3.66% | -27.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.12% | -33.77% | +17.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 2.90% | +0.59% |
Volatility
MSED.L vs. IMIB.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) at 3.80%. This indicates that MSED.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMIB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSED.L | IMIB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 3.80% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.86% | 12.61% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.36% | 15.14% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.93% | 17.91% | +16.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.63% | 19.27% | +10.36% |
MSED.L vs. IMIB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSED.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IMIB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSED.L vs. IMIB.L - Dividend Comparison
MSED.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMIB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMIB.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 3.78% | 3.83% | 4.53% | 3.77% | 3.90% | 3.15% | 1.44% | 3.41% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 2.82% | 2.15% |
MSED.L Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSED.L and IMIB.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSED.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSED.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IMIB.L.
MSED.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while IMIB.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for MSED.L and 0.35% for IMIB.L.
Find the right allocation for MSED.L and IMIB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer