IMIB.L vs. BNKE.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) and Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L).

IMIB.L and BNKE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMIB.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. It was launched on Jul 6, 2007. BNKE.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Nov 8, 2018. Both IMIB.L and BNKE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IMIB.L vs. BNKE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) and Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IMIB.L vs. BNKE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IMIB.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)	2.09%	43.79%	13.17%	30.54%	-3.58%	18.30%	1.46%	1.77%
BNKE.L Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	-5.22%	99.94%	25.19%	27.75%	6.62%	31.33%	-18.12%	2.40%

Different Trading Currencies

IMIB.L is traded in GBp, while BNKE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BNKE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMIB.L achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than BNKE.L's -5.22% return.

IMIB.L

• 1D: 3.10%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: 2.09%
• 6M: 7.69%
• 1Y: 29.20%
• 3Y*: 24.19%
• 5Y*: 18.52%
• 10Y*: 14.75%

BNKE.L

• 1D: 4.59%
• 1M: -4.00%
• YTD: -5.22%
• 6M: 7.45%
• 1Y: 44.05%
• 3Y*: 42.12%
• 5Y*: 30.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMIB.L vs. BNKE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMIB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BNKE.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

IMIB.L

iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)

BNKE.L

Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc

Return for Risk

IMIB.L vs. BNKE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMIB.L

IMIB.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
IMIB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
IMIB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IMIB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
IMIB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
IMIB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

BNKE.L

BNKE.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
BNKE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
BNKE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
BNKE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BNKE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BNKE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMIB.L vs. BNKE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) and Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IMIB.L	BNKE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.77	-0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.26	-0.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.30	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	2.67	+0.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.72	9.26	+0.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IMIB.L vs. BNKE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMIB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the BNKE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMIB.L and BNKE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IMIB.L	BNKE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	1.77	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	1.20	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.70	-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between IMIB.L and BNKE.L is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IMIB.L vs. BNKE.L - Dividend Comparison

IMIB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, while BNKE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMIB.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)	3.76%	3.83%	4.54%	3.77%	3.91%	3.15%	1.44%	3.41%	3.25%	2.29%	2.82%	2.15%
BNKE.L Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IMIB.L vs. BNKE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMIB.L drawdown since its inception was -59.82%, which is greater than BNKE.L's maximum drawdown of -48.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMIB.L and BNKE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMIB.L	BNKE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.82%	-48.52%	-11.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.62%	-16.66%	+4.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.06%	-34.21%	+10.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.07%	-10.88%	+6.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.75%	-10.54%	-8.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	4.79%	-1.75%

Volatility

IMIB.L vs. BNKE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) is 6.92%, while Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that IMIB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNKE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMIB.L	BNKE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.92%	9.76%	-2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.93%	17.26%	-5.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.62%	24.84%	-7.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.88%	25.27%	-7.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.64%	29.70%	-10.06%