MSED.L vs. XASX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XASX.L).
MSED.L and XASX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MSED.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Apr 3, 2013. XASX.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on Jun 15, 2007. Both MSED.L and XASX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MSED.L or XASX.L.
Key characteristics
| MSED.L | XASX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.15% | 12.70% |
| 1Y Return | -47.40% | 16.21% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -16.48% | 6.80% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -7.33% | 4.87% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -0.15% | 5.27% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.86 | 1.28 |
| Daily Std Dev | 55.46% | 11.30% |
| Max Drawdown | -58.05% | -45.50% |
| Current Drawdown | -49.87% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSED.L and XASX.L is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MSED.L vs. XASX.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MSED.L achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly lower than XASX.L's 12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MSED.L has underperformed XASX.L with an annualized return of -0.15%, while XASX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 5.27% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSED.L vs. XASX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSED.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XASX.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MSED.L vs. XASX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XASX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MSED.L vs. XASX.L - Dividend Comparison
MSED.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XASX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSED.L Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XASX.L Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D | 4.25% | 3.39% | 6.09% | 2.50% | 5.94% | 3.73% | 4.36% | 3.72% | 3.77% | 0.39% | 3.04% | 2.98% |
Drawdowns
MSED.L vs. XASX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSED.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than XASX.L's maximum drawdown of -45.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSED.L and XASX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MSED.L vs. XASX.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XASX.L) at 3.46%. This indicates that MSED.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XASX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.