PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSDD vs. TSLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSDD vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSDD achieves a -47.16% return, which is significantly lower than TSLR's -20.05% return.


MSDD

1D
13.67%
1M
85.18%
YTD
-47.16%
6M
-24.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLR

1D
-0.17%
1M
13.88%
YTD
-20.05%
6M
-20.52%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSDD vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
-47.16%271.43%
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
-20.05%57.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MSDD and TSLR is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

-0.39

MSDD vs. TSLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSDD
TSLR

Technology

200.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

66.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MSDD
200.1%
TSLR

-

Basic Materials

MSDD

-

TSLR

-

Communication Services

MSDD

-

TSLR

-

Consumer Cyclical

MSDD

-

TSLR
66.6%

Consumer Defensive

MSDD

-

TSLR

-

Energy

MSDD

-

TSLR

-

Financial Services

MSDD

-

TSLR

-

Healthcare

MSDD

-

TSLR

-

Industrials

MSDD

-

TSLR

-

Real Estate

MSDD

-

TSLR

-

Utilities

MSDD

-

TSLR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSDD vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSDD

TSLR
TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSDD vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSDD vs. TSLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSDDTSLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.00

+0.70

Drawdowns

MSDD vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSDD drawdown since its inception was -84.91%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSDD and TSLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSDDTSLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.91%

-82.80%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.67%

-59.09%

-8.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.42%

-50.24%

+20.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.45%

Volatility

MSDD vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSDDTSLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.56%

92.75%

+48.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

141.56%

115.54%

+26.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

141.56%

115.54%

+26.02%

MSDD vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSDD and TSLR have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

MSDD vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSDD nor TSLR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MSDD and TSLR have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSDD and TSLR have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

MSDD and TSLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TSLR is Leveraged Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSDD and TSLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer