PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSDD vs. DUKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSDD vs. DUKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSDD achieves a -49.24% return, which is significantly lower than DUKQ's 13.22% return.


MSDD

1D
-3.94%
1M
84.54%
YTD
-49.24%
6M
-28.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DUKQ

1D
0.29%
1M
5.34%
YTD
13.22%
6M
12.99%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSDD vs. DUKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
-49.24%271.43%
DUKQ
Ocean Park Domestic ETF
13.22%10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MSDD and DUKQ is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

-0.47

MSDD vs. DUKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSDD
DUKQ

Technology

200.1%
30.1%

Basic Materials

-

2.9%

Communication Services

-

8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.9%

Energy

-

4.9%

Financial Services

-

10.3%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Industrials

-

11.5%

Real Estate

-

3.3%

Utilities

-

4.1%

Technology

MSDD
200.1%
DUKQ
30.1%

Basic Materials

MSDD

-

DUKQ
2.9%

Communication Services

MSDD

-

DUKQ
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MSDD

-

DUKQ
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

MSDD

-

DUKQ
5.9%

Energy

MSDD

-

DUKQ
4.9%

Financial Services

MSDD

-

DUKQ
10.3%

Healthcare

MSDD

-

DUKQ
8.6%

Industrials

MSDD

-

DUKQ
11.5%

Real Estate

MSDD

-

DUKQ
3.3%

Utilities

MSDD

-

DUKQ
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSDD vs. DUKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSDD

DUKQ
DUKQ Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DUKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DUKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSDD vs. DUKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSDD vs. DUKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSDDDUKQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.88

-0.23

Drawdowns

MSDD vs. DUKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSDD drawdown since its inception was -84.91%, which is greater than DUKQ's maximum drawdown of -18.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSDD and DUKQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSDDDUKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.91%

-18.44%

-66.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.95%

-0.19%

-68.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.58%

-3.90%

-25.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

Volatility

MSDD vs. DUKQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSDDDUKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.35%

12.43%

+128.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

141.35%

14.77%

+126.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

141.35%

14.77%

+126.58%

MSDD vs. DUKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DUKQ's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSDD vs. DUKQ - Dividend Comparison

MSDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DUKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.


PositionTTM20252024
DUKQ
Ocean Park Domestic ETF
0.66%0.68%0.28%
MSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSDD and DUKQ have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DUKQ is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DUKQ is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.

DUKQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for MSDD.

MSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DUKQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Ocean Park. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSDD and 0.98% for DUKQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSDD and DUKQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer