MSDD vs. DUKQ
MSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF) and DUKQ (Ocean Park Domestic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while DUKQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Ocean Park. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.47, they often move in opposite directions. MSDD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for DUKQ.
Performance
MSDD vs. DUKQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSDD achieves a -49.24% return, which is significantly lower than DUKQ's 13.22% return.
MSDD
- 1D
- -3.94%
- 1M
- 84.54%
- YTD
- -49.24%
- 6M
- -28.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUKQ
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 12.99%
- 1Y
- 27.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSDD vs. DUKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSDD GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF | -49.24% | 271.43% |
DUKQ Ocean Park Domestic ETF | 13.22% | 10.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSDD and DUKQ is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | -0.47 |
MSDD vs. DUKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSDD
DUKQ
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MSDD
DUKQ
Basic Materials
MSDD
-
DUKQ
Communication Services
MSDD
-
DUKQ
Consumer Cyclical
MSDD
-
DUKQ
Consumer Defensive
MSDD
-
DUKQ
Energy
MSDD
-
DUKQ
Financial Services
MSDD
-
DUKQ
Healthcare
MSDD
-
DUKQ
Industrials
MSDD
-
DUKQ
Real Estate
MSDD
-
DUKQ
Utilities
MSDD
-
DUKQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSDD vs. DUKQ — Risk / Return Rank
MSDD
DUKQ
MSDD vs. DUKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSDD | DUKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.88 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
MSDD vs. DUKQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSDD drawdown since its inception was -84.91%, which is greater than DUKQ's maximum drawdown of -18.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSDD and DUKQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSDD | DUKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.91% | -18.44% | -66.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.95% | -0.19% | -68.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.58% | -3.90% | -25.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
MSDD vs. DUKQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSDD | DUKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 141.35% | 12.43% | +128.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 141.35% | 14.77% | +126.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 141.35% | 14.77% | +126.58% |
MSDD vs. DUKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DUKQ's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSDD vs. DUKQ - Dividend Comparison
MSDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DUKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DUKQ Ocean Park Domestic ETF | 0.66% | 0.68% | 0.28% |
MSDD GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSDD and DUKQ have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DUKQ is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DUKQ is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.
DUKQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for MSDD.
MSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DUKQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Ocean Park. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSDD and 0.98% for DUKQ.
Find the right allocation for MSDD and DUKQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer