MSDD vs. BULZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF) and BULZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - MSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BULZ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive FANG Innovation. MSDD is actively managed, while BULZ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.53, they often move in opposite directions. MSDD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BULZ.

Performance

MSDD vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSDD achieves a -49.24% return, which is significantly lower than BULZ's 92.22% return.

MSDD

• 1D: -3.94%
• 1M: 84.54%
• YTD: -49.24%
• 6M: -28.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BULZ

• 1D: -4.32%
• 1M: 33.43%
• YTD: 92.22%
• 6M: 82.15%
• 1Y: 239.73%
• 3Y*: 100.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSDD vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSDD GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF	-49.24%	271.43%
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	92.22%	66.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MSDD and BULZ is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025	-0.53

MSDD vs. BULZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSDD	BULZ
Technology	200.1%	62.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	25.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MSDD vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 75
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSDD vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSDD	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.18	+0.47

Drawdowns

MSDD vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSDD drawdown since its inception was -84.91%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSDD and BULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSDD	BULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.91%	-94.44%	+9.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-54.22%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-67.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.95%	-9.44%	-59.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.58%	-58.38%	+28.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	20.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSDD	BULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	22.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	56.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	141.35%	74.46%	+66.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	141.35%	91.22%	+50.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	141.35%	91.22%	+50.13%

MSDD vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSDD vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSDD nor BULZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSDD and BULZ in my portfolio?

MSDD and BULZ have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSDD or BULZ?

On fees, BULZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSDD or BULZ?

BULZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSDD or BULZ?

MSDD and BULZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MSDD and BULZ?

MSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BULZ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSDD and 0.95% for BULZ.