PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSCVX vs. MTFEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSCVX vs. MTFEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MSCVX) and MainStay MacKay Strategic Municipal Allocation Fund (MTFEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSCVX achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly higher than MTFEX's 1.60% return.


MSCVX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.76%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.28%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
2.07%

MTFEX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.35%
YTD
1.60%
6M
2.00%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
1.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSCVX vs. MTFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MSCVX
MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund
1.89%3.53%2.74%6.09%-11.16%2.34%4.75%3.24%
MTFEX
MainStay MacKay Strategic Municipal Allocation Fund
1.60%4.65%2.02%5.14%-7.11%2.07%4.32%2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between MSCVX and MTFEX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.87

The correlation between MSCVX and MTFEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSCVX vs. MTFEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSCVX
MSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MTFEX
MTFEX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MTFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MTFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSCVX vs. MTFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MSCVX) and MainStay MacKay Strategic Municipal Allocation Fund (MTFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSCVXMTFEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.81

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.37

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.94

7.93

+0.01

MSCVX vs. MTFEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the MTFEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSCVX and MTFEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSCVX vs. MTFEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSCVX drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, which is greater than MTFEX's maximum drawdown of -11.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCVX and MTFEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSCVXMTFEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

-11.88%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-2.78%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-4.34%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.13%

-11.88%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.60%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-2.72%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.83%

+0.06%

Volatility

MSCVX vs. MTFEX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MSCVX) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to MainStay MacKay Strategic Municipal Allocation Fund (MTFEX) at 0.65%. This indicates that MSCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSCVXMTFEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

0.65%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

1.77%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

2.25%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.46%

3.13%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

3.90%

+0.78%

MSCVX vs. MTFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSCVX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than MTFEX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSCVX vs. MTFEX - Dividend Comparison

MSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than MTFEX's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSCVX
MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund
3.27%4.45%3.84%2.84%2.81%2.13%2.48%2.78%3.01%3.07%3.16%3.50%
MTFEX
MainStay MacKay Strategic Municipal Allocation Fund
3.33%3.33%3.48%2.74%2.30%2.36%1.74%1.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSCVX and MTFEX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSCVX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to MTFEX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSCVX dropped -17.13% vs MTFEX's -11.88%.

MTFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSCVX and MTFEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer