PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSCVX vs. MECVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSCVX vs. MECVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MSCVX) and MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund (MECVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSCVX achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than MECVX's 7.56% return.


MSCVX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.76%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.28%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
2.07%

MECVX

1D
1.04%
1M
1.85%
YTD
7.56%
6M
6.52%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSCVX vs. MECVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSCVX
MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund
1.89%3.53%2.74%6.09%-11.16%2.34%4.75%8.39%1.67%6.35%
MECVX
MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund
7.56%13.10%10.52%29.35%-19.63%25.00%29.21%34.56%-8.92%26.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MSCVX and MECVX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2016

0.08

The correlation between MSCVX and MECVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSCVX vs. MECVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSCVX
MSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MECVX
MECVX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MECVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MECVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MECVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MECVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MECVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSCVX vs. MECVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MSCVX) and MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund (MECVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSCVXMECVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.25

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

1.85

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.94

7.30

+0.63

MSCVX vs. MECVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the MECVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSCVX and MECVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSCVX vs. MECVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSCVX drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, smaller than the maximum MECVX drawdown of -30.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCVX and MECVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSCVXMECVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

-30.36%

+13.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-10.06%

+7.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-16.57%

+10.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.13%

-29.51%

+12.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.78%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-4.91%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

2.54%

-1.65%

Volatility

MSCVX vs. MECVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MSCVX) is 0.75%, while MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund (MECVX) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that MSCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MECVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSCVXMECVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

4.68%

-3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

10.47%

-8.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

13.02%

-10.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.46%

16.52%

-12.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

16.85%

-12.17%

MSCVX vs. MECVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSCVX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than MECVX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSCVX vs. MECVX - Dividend Comparison

MSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than MECVX's 7.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MECVX
MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund
7.55%8.12%4.30%0.32%1.01%28.36%19.49%9.87%7.96%3.31%0.22%0.00%
MSCVX
MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund
3.27%4.45%3.84%2.84%2.81%2.13%2.48%2.78%3.01%3.07%3.16%3.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSCVX and MECVX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MECVX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to MSCVX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSCVX dropped -17.13% vs MECVX's -30.36%.

MSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSCVX and MECVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer