MSCVX vs. MNOVX
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MSCVX) and MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MNOVX).
MSCVX is managed by MainStay. It was launched on Feb 27, 2013. MNOVX is managed by MainStay. It was launched on May 13, 2012.
Performance
MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCVX MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund | -0.63% | 3.53% | 2.74% | 6.09% | -11.16% | 2.34% | 4.75% | 8.39% | 1.67% | 6.35% |
MNOVX MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund | -0.55% | 4.39% | 2.21% | 6.55% | -12.42% | 3.68% | 5.10% | 7.59% | 1.92% | 5.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSCVX achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than MNOVX's -0.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MSCVX having a 2.14% annualized return and MNOVX not far behind at 2.13%.
MSCVX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.14%
MNOVX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.78%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.56%
- 10Y*
- 2.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSCVX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than MNOVX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MSCVX vs. MNOVX — Risk / Return Rank
MSCVX
MNOVX
MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MSCVX) and MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MNOVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSCVX | MNOVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.83 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 1.15 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 2.41 | -0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSCVX | MNOVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.83 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.12 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.45 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.64 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSCVX and MNOVX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Dividend Comparison
MSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than MNOVX's 3.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSCVX MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund | 3.34% | 4.45% | 3.84% | 2.84% | 2.81% | 2.13% | 2.48% | 2.78% | 3.01% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.50% |
MNOVX MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund | 3.73% | 4.85% | 3.65% | 2.92% | 2.92% | 2.24% | 2.68% | 3.17% | 3.35% | 3.42% | 3.47% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSCVX drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, smaller than the maximum MNOVX drawdown of -18.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCVX and MNOVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSCVX | MNOVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.13% | -18.57% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.08% | -5.54% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.13% | -18.57% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.13% | -18.57% | +1.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.86% | -2.78% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -3.43% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.94% | -0.20% |
Volatility
MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MSCVX) is 1.01%, while MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MNOVX) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that MSCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNOVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSCVX | MNOVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 1.24% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.68% | 2.00% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.88% | 5.86% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.43% | 4.88% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.67% | 4.77% | -0.10% |