MSCVX vs. MNOVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MSCVX (MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund) and MNOVX (MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds from MainStay. Over the past 10 years, MSCVX returned 2.07%/yr vs 2.17%/yr for MNOVX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSCVX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for MNOVX.

Performance

MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MSCVX) and MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MNOVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSCVX achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than MNOVX's 2.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MSCVX having a 2.07% annualized return and MNOVX not far ahead at 2.17%.

MSCVX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.76%
• YTD: 1.89%
• 6M: 2.28%
• 1Y: 7.03%
• 3Y*: 4.11%
• 5Y*: 0.55%
• 10Y*: 2.07%

MNOVX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: 8.82%
• 3Y*: 4.39%
• 5Y*: 0.65%
• 10Y*: 2.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSCVX MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund	1.89%	3.53%	2.74%	6.09%	-11.16%	2.34%	4.75%	8.39%	1.67%	6.35%
MNOVX MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund	2.75%	4.39%	2.21%	6.55%	-12.42%	3.68%	5.10%	7.59%	1.92%	5.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MSCVX and MNOVX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.87

The correlation between MSCVX and MNOVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MSCVX vs. MNOVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSCVX

MSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 71
MSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
MSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
MSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

MNOVX

MNOVX Risk / Return Rank: 79
MNOVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MNOVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MNOVX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
MNOVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
MNOVX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MSCVX) and MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MNOVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSCVX	MNOVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	2.67	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.21	4.36	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.69	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	2.97	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.94	10.68	-2.74

MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the MNOVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSCVX and MNOVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSCVX drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, smaller than the maximum MNOVX drawdown of -18.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCVX and MNOVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSCVX	MNOVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.13%	-18.57%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.97%	-2.99%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.10%	-7.07%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.13%	-18.57%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.13%	-18.57%	+1.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	0.00%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.04%	-3.39%	+0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	0.83%	+0.06%

Volatility

MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MSCVX) is 0.75%, while MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund (MNOVX) has a volatility of 0.87%. This indicates that MSCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNOVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSCVX	MNOVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	0.87%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.05%	2.42%	-0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63%	3.33%	-0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.46%	4.93%	-0.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.68%	4.79%	-0.11%

MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSCVX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than MNOVX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSCVX vs. MNOVX - Dividend Comparison

MSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than MNOVX's 3.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MNOVX MainStay MacKay New York Tax Free Opportunities Fund	3.70%	4.85%	3.65%	2.92%	2.92%	2.24%	2.68%	3.17%	3.35%	3.42%	3.47%	3.53%
MSCVX MainStay MacKay California Tax Free Opportunities Fund	3.27%	4.45%	3.84%	2.84%	2.81%	2.13%	2.48%	2.78%	3.01%	3.07%	3.16%	3.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSCVX and MNOVX in my portfolio?

MSCVX and MNOVX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSCVX or MNOVX?

MNOVX has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to MSCVX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSCVX dropped -17.13% vs MNOVX's -18.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.