PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSCOX vs. MACGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSCOX vs. MACGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Inception Portfolio Class C (MSCOX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSCOX achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly higher than MACGX's 4.28% return.


MSCOX

1D
1.29%
1M
3.56%
YTD
6.15%
6M
-0.88%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
-8.70%
10Y*

MACGX

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
4.28%
6M
0.41%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
25.37%
5Y*
-3.88%
10Y*
14.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSCOX vs. MACGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSCOX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Inception Portfolio Class C
6.15%0.00%28.07%52.94%-59.90%-5.01%147.58%35.22%-0.81%3.20%
MACGX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A
4.28%13.71%42.06%46.30%-63.51%-12.84%142.01%39.41%11.85%7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MSCOX and MACGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2017

0.91

The correlation between MSCOX and MACGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSCOX vs. MACGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSCOX
MSCOX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MSCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MSCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

MACGX
MACGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MACGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MACGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSCOX vs. MACGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Inception Portfolio Class C (MSCOX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSCOXMACGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.04

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

0.12

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.40

0.25

+0.15

MSCOX vs. MACGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSCOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the MACGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSCOX and MACGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSCOXMACGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

0.12

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

-0.08

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.33

+0.02

Drawdowns

MSCOX vs. MACGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSCOX drawdown since its inception was -76.57%, roughly equal to the maximum MACGX drawdown of -77.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCOX and MACGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSCOXMACGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.57%

-77.61%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.16%

-27.55%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.16%

-28.55%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.60%

-77.61%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.02%

-42.02%

-7.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.44%

-25.65%

-8.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.60%

12.79%

+2.81%

Volatility

MSCOX vs. MACGX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Inception Portfolio Class C (MSCOX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX) have volatilities of 9.50% and 9.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSCOXMACGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

9.32%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.59%

21.23%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.96%

27.92%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.96%

48.30%

-10.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.52%

39.36%

-4.84%

MSCOX vs. MACGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSCOX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MACGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSCOX vs. MACGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSCOX nor MACGX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MACGX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%52.53%9.95%15.34%29.46%48.48%75.72%14.05%
MSCOX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Inception Portfolio Class C
0.00%0.00%0.61%0.00%0.15%38.66%13.71%23.55%18.35%57.78%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, MSCOX and MACGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MSCOX has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to MACGX (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSCOX dropped -76.57% vs MACGX's -77.61%.

MSCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSCOX and MACGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer