MSBT vs. XRPC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) and XRPC (Canary XRP ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. MSBT is passively managed, while XRPC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSBT charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XRPC.

Performance

MSBT vs. XRPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and Canary XRP ETF (XRPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MSBT

• 1D: -2.70%
• 1M: -18.41%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRPC

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -14.06%
• YTD: -34.29%
• 6M: -45.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSBT vs. XRPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust	-8.40%
XRPC Canary XRP ETF	-11.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MSBT and XRPC is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026	0.85

Return for Risk

MSBT vs. XRPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and Canary XRP ETF (XRPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSBT	XRPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.33	-0.92	-0.41

Drawdowns

MSBT vs. XRPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSBT drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum XRPC drawdown of -48.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSBT and XRPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSBT	XRPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.25%	-48.85%	+28.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.25%	-48.24%	+27.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-29.50%	+25.59%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSBT	XRPC	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.92%	75.88%	-42.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.92%	75.88%	-42.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.92%	75.88%	-42.96%

MSBT vs. XRPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSBT has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XRPC's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSBT vs. XRPC - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSBT nor XRPC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSBT and XRPC in my portfolio?

MSBT and XRPC have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSBT or XRPC?

On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSBT or XRPC?

MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XRPC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSBT or XRPC?

MSBT and XRPC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MSBT and XRPC?

They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Canary Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for MSBT and 0.50% for XRPC.