MSBT vs. EZPZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate while EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. Both are passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MSBT charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.

Performance

MSBT vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MSBT

• 1D: -2.70%
• 1M: -18.41%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZPZ

• 1D: -3.03%
• 1M: -18.55%
• YTD: -28.21%
• 6M: -33.71%
• 1Y: -39.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSBT vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust	-8.40%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-9.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MSBT and EZPZ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026	0.98

Return for Risk

MSBT vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSBT vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSBT	EZPZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.33	-0.61	-0.72

Drawdowns

MSBT vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSBT drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSBT and EZPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSBT	EZPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.25%	-52.38%	+32.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-52.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.25%	-51.59%	+31.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-21.72%	+17.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	30.44%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSBT	EZPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.92%	46.83%	-13.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.92%	47.65%	-14.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.92%	47.65%	-14.73%

MSBT vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSBT has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MSBT vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSBT nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSBT and EZPZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, MSBT and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MSBT or EZPZ?

On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSBT or EZPZ?

MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZPZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSBT or EZPZ?

MSBT and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MSBT and EZPZ?

MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate, while EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for MSBT and 0.19% for EZPZ.