PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSAQX vs. MATFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSAQX vs. MATFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX) and Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSAQX achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly lower than MATFX's 64.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MSAQX has underperformed MATFX with an annualized return of 10.88%, while MATFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.28% annualized return.


MSAQX

1D
1.28%
1M
13.16%
YTD
20.18%
6M
16.23%
1Y
17.11%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
-3.56%
10Y*
10.88%

MATFX

1D
-0.29%
1M
16.96%
YTD
64.51%
6M
66.89%
1Y
101.02%
3Y*
35.59%
5Y*
11.22%
10Y*
16.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSAQX vs. MATFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSAQX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio
20.18%2.06%19.71%-6.83%-22.01%-20.52%52.55%44.74%-13.64%76.83%
MATFX
Matthews Asia Innovators Fund
64.51%30.22%16.47%-1.77%-24.66%-5.90%86.75%29.60%-18.59%52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MSAQX and MATFX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.87

The correlation between MSAQX and MATFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSAQX vs. MATFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSAQX
MSAQX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MSAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MSAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

MATFX
MATFX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MATFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MATFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MATFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MATFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MATFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSAQX vs. MATFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX) and Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSAQXMATFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.80

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

9.33

-8.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

26.06

-24.22

MSAQX vs. MATFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSAQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the MATFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSAQX and MATFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSAQXMATFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

4.68

-3.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.46

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.72

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.33

+0.17

Drawdowns

MSAQX vs. MATFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSAQX drawdown since its inception was -61.11%, smaller than the maximum MATFX drawdown of -76.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSAQX and MATFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSAQXMATFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.11%

-76.88%

+15.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.57%

-11.33%

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.57%

-18.19%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.29%

-45.33%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.11%

-52.42%

-8.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.78%

-0.43%

-30.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.42%

-28.17%

+3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.13%

3.99%

+5.14%

Volatility

MSAQX vs. MATFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio (MSAQX) is 9.27%, while Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that MSAQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MATFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSAQXMATFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.27%

10.46%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.83%

19.23%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.61%

22.62%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.54%

24.50%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

22.64%

-0.26%

MSAQX vs. MATFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSAQX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MATFX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSAQX vs. MATFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSAQX nor MATFX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MATFX
Matthews Asia Innovators Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.54%31.07%1.67%0.29%2.63%8.44%0.00%15.24%
MSAQX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Asia Opportunity Portfolio
0.00%0.00%1.82%0.26%0.00%0.88%1.06%0.05%0.69%1.12%2.24%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSAQX and MATFX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MATFX has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to MSAQX (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSAQX dropped -61.11% vs MATFX's -76.88%.

MATFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.68 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSAQX and MATFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer