PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSACX vs. JIJIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSACX vs. JIJIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) and John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSACX achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly higher than JIJIX's 12.26% return.


MSACX

1D
3.49%
1M
-0.87%
6M
6.19%
YTD
14.20%
1Y
13.78%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
8.63%
ALL TIME*
6.51%

JIJIX

1D
5.43%
1M
-7.92%
6M
2.38%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MSACX vs. JIJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MSACX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio
14.20%21.80%7.17%12.50%-21.58%2.26%30.48%9.94%
JIJIX
John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund
12.26%23.10%24.88%18.92%-31.47%17.94%36.58%13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MSACX and JIJIX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.85

The correlation between MSACX and JIJIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSACX vs. JIJIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSACX
MSACX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MSACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSACX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MSACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSACX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

JIJIX
JIJIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JIJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
JIJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSACX vs. JIJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) and John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSACXJIJIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.16

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

1.16

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.85

4.16

-1.31

MSACX vs. JIJIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSACX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the JIJIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSACX and JIJIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSACX vs. JIJIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSACX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, which is greater than JIJIX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSACX and JIJIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSACXJIJIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-41.80%

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.85%

-20.23%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-20.23%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.36%

-41.80%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.09%

-15.90%

+10.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.21%

-11.35%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

5.62%

-1.30%

Volatility

MSACX vs. JIJIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) is 7.31%, while John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that MSACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIJIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSACXJIJIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

12.20%

-4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.95%

27.33%

-11.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.24%

29.67%

-7.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

22.03%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

22.97%

-4.73%

MSACX vs. JIJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSACX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than JIJIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSACX vs. JIJIX - Dividend Comparison

MSACX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JIJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIJIX
John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund
2.62%2.94%0.13%0.22%0.79%30.17%5.62%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSACX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio
0.00%0.00%3.49%3.41%1.73%8.51%0.04%1.25%1.70%2.04%2.42%0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MSACX and JIJIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JIJIX has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to MSACX (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSACX dropped -55.43% vs JIJIX's -41.80%.

JIJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSACX and JIJIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer