JIJIX vs. MDIDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JIJIX (John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund) and MDIDX (MFS International Diversification Fund Class A) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, JIJIX returned 11.99%/yr vs 7.28%/yr for MDIDX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JIJIX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for MDIDX.

Performance

JIJIX vs. MDIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) and MFS International Diversification Fund Class A (MDIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIJIX achieves a 30.75% return, which is significantly higher than MDIDX's 10.03% return.

JIJIX

• 1D: 3.99%
• 1M: 8.83%
• YTD: 30.75%
• 6M: 31.33%
• 1Y: 45.99%
• 3Y*: 27.22%
• 5Y*: 11.99%
• 10Y*: —

MDIDX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 10.03%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 23.03%
• 3Y*: 14.85%
• 5Y*: 7.28%
• 10Y*: 9.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIJIX vs. MDIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JIJIX John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund	30.75%	23.10%	24.88%	18.92%	-31.47%	17.94%	36.58%	13.65%
MDIDX MFS International Diversification Fund Class A	10.03%	27.58%	6.12%	14.05%	-17.31%	7.42%	14.99%	9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between JIJIX and MDIDX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019	0.83

The correlation between JIJIX and MDIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JIJIX vs. MDIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIJIX

JIJIX Risk / Return Rank: 48
JIJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
JIJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
JIJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
JIJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JIJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

MDIDX

MDIDX Risk / Return Rank: 37
MDIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
MDIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MDIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
MDIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MDIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIJIX vs. MDIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) and MFS International Diversification Fund Class A (MDIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JIJIX	MDIDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.70	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.39	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.32	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	1.96	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.83	7.34	+3.48

JIJIX vs. MDIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIJIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the MDIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIJIX and MDIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JIJIX vs. MDIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIJIX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum MDIDX drawdown of -56.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIJIX and MDIDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JIJIX	MDIDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.80%	-56.80%	+15.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.01%	-11.41%	-4.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.04%	-12.60%	-5.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.80%	-30.40%	-11.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.10%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.36%	-9.33%	-2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	3.03%	+1.16%

Volatility

JIJIX vs. MDIDX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to MFS International Diversification Fund Class A (MDIDX) at 4.92%. This indicates that JIJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JIJIX	MDIDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.16%	4.92%	+8.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.69%	11.00%	+12.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.10%	13.10%	+13.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.16%	14.35%	+6.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.49%	14.73%	+7.76%

JIJIX vs. MDIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIJIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MDIDX's 1.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

JIJIX vs. MDIDX - Dividend Comparison

JIJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than MDIDX's 4.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JIJIX John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund	2.25%	2.94%	0.13%	0.22%	0.79%	30.17%	5.62%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MDIDX MFS International Diversification Fund Class A	4.53%	4.99%	3.27%	3.94%	2.41%	2.47%	1.45%	2.30%	2.89%	1.42%	1.94%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JIJIX and MDIDX in my portfolio?

JIJIX and MDIDX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JIJIX or MDIDX?

JIJIX has higher volatility (13.16%) compared to MDIDX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIJIX dropped -41.80% vs MDIDX's -56.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JIJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.