PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSACX vs. THOIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSACX vs. THOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) and Thornburg Global Opportunities Fund (THOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSACX achieves a 17.05% return, which is significantly higher than THOIX's 14.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MSACX has underperformed THOIX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while THOIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.


MSACX

1D
0.68%
1M
5.92%
YTD
17.05%
6M
5.92%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
8.95%

THOIX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.66%
YTD
14.72%
6M
17.78%
1Y
40.96%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
14.03%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSACX vs. THOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSACX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio
17.05%21.80%7.17%12.50%-21.58%2.26%30.48%22.42%-15.15%24.79%
THOIX
Thornburg Global Opportunities Fund
14.72%41.04%13.08%16.26%-10.12%14.72%22.50%28.74%-20.72%22.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MSACX and THOIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.81

The correlation between MSACX and THOIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSACX vs. THOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSACX
MSACX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MSACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSACX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MSACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSACX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

THOIX
THOIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
THOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
THOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
THOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
THOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSACX vs. THOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) and Thornburg Global Opportunities Fund (THOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSACXTHOIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.73

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

4.81

-3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

20.81

-16.38

MSACX vs. THOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSACX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the THOIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSACX and THOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSACXTHOIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

3.78

-2.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.86

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.77

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.56

-0.19

Drawdowns

MSACX vs. THOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSACX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, smaller than the maximum THOIX drawdown of -64.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSACX and THOIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSACXTHOIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-64.58%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.85%

-8.62%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-13.71%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.36%

-30.18%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.36%

-35.22%

-2.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-11.47%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

1.99%

+1.97%

Volatility

MSACX vs. THOIX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Thornburg Global Opportunities Fund (THOIX) at 3.29%. This indicates that MSACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSACXTHOIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

3.29%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.77%

8.34%

+10.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.69%

10.99%

+8.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.74%

16.42%

+2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

17.53%

+0.75%

MSACX vs. THOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSACX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than THOIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSACX vs. THOIX - Dividend Comparison

MSACX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while THOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSACX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio
0.00%0.00%3.49%3.41%1.73%8.51%0.04%1.25%1.70%2.04%2.42%0.97%
THOIX
Thornburg Global Opportunities Fund
5.60%6.42%5.70%5.70%4.00%14.39%6.70%1.47%2.65%0.67%0.82%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSACX and THOIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSACX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to THOIX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSACX dropped -55.43% vs THOIX's -64.58%.

THOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSACX and THOIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer