PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSACX vs. GTMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSACX vs. GTMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) and GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund (GTMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSACX achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than GTMIX's 21.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MSACX has underperformed GTMIX with an annualized return of 8.77%, while GTMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.90% annualized return.


MSACX

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.41%
6M
6.68%
YTD
14.73%
1Y
14.31%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
8.77%
ALL TIME*
6.52%

GTMIX

1D
-0.84%
1M
6.02%
6M
13.22%
YTD
21.02%
1Y
43.83%
3Y*
22.27%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
10.90%
ALL TIME*
7.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MSACX vs. GTMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSACX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio
14.73%21.80%7.17%12.50%-21.58%2.26%30.48%22.42%-15.15%24.79%
GTMIX
GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund
21.02%46.17%1.54%14.96%-10.13%10.71%7.50%23.35%-21.23%28.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MSACX and GTMIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.90

The correlation between MSACX and GTMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSACX vs. GTMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSACX
MSACX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MSACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSACX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MSACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSACX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GTMIX
GTMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GTMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GTMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSACX vs. GTMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) and GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund (GTMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSACXGTMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.62

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

5.57

-4.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

22.08

-18.88

MSACX vs. GTMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSACX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the GTMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSACX and GTMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSACX vs. GTMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSACX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, roughly equal to the maximum GTMIX drawdown of -58.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSACX and GTMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSACXGTMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-58.31%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.85%

-7.90%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-14.11%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.36%

-27.34%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.36%

-40.32%

+2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-0.84%

-3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.21%

-12.61%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

1.99%

+2.34%

Volatility

MSACX vs. GTMIX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund (GTMIX) at 3.74%. This indicates that MSACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSACXGTMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

3.74%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.95%

10.11%

+5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.23%

12.71%

+9.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

14.89%

+4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

15.76%

+2.48%

MSACX vs. GTMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSACX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GTMIX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSACX vs. GTMIX - Dividend Comparison

MSACX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GTMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTMIX
GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund
20.87%22.43%5.94%0.36%5.44%16.55%2.25%4.13%7.25%2.96%4.05%3.26%
MSACX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio
0.00%0.00%3.49%3.41%1.73%8.51%0.04%1.25%1.70%2.04%2.42%0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSACX and GTMIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSACX has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to GTMIX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSACX dropped -55.43% vs GTMIX's -58.31%.

GTMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSACX and GTMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer