PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSACX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSACX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSACX achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 11.78% return.


MSACX

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.41%
6M
6.68%
YTD
14.73%
1Y
14.31%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
8.77%
ALL TIME*
6.52%

FHLFX

1D
-0.71%
1M
1.26%
6M
5.76%
YTD
11.78%
1Y
25.30%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MSACX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MSACX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio
14.73%21.80%7.17%12.50%-21.58%2.26%30.48%22.42%-11.85%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
11.78%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MSACX and FHLFX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.90

The correlation between MSACX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSACX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSACX
MSACX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MSACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSACX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MSACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSACX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSACX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSACXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.30

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

2.23

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

8.46

-5.27

MSACX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSACX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSACX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSACX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSACX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSACX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSACXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-33.58%

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.85%

-11.37%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-13.62%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.36%

-29.36%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-0.71%

-3.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.21%

-6.01%

-6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

3.00%

+1.33%

Volatility

MSACX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.47%. This indicates that MSACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSACXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

4.47%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.95%

13.25%

+2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.23%

15.52%

+6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

16.11%

+3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

17.62%

+0.62%

MSACX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSACX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSACX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

MSACX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FHLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.10%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSACX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio
0.00%0.00%3.49%3.41%1.73%8.51%0.04%1.25%1.70%2.04%2.42%0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSACX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSACX has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to FHLFX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSACX dropped -55.43% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSACX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer