PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSA vs. TGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSA vs. TGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) and Target Corporation (TGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSA achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than TGT's 40.98% return. Over the past 10 years, MSA has outperformed TGT with an annualized return of 13.42%, while TGT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.


MSA

1D
1.64%
1M
6.97%
6M
-1.38%
YTD
7.15%
1Y
-0.04%
3Y*
1.51%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
13.42%

TGT

1D
2.17%
1M
1.88%
6M
30.60%
YTD
40.98%
1Y
35.32%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
-8.75%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSA vs. TGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSA
MSA Safety Incorporated
7.15%-2.14%-0.71%18.52%-3.15%2.14%19.79%36.10%23.61%13.97%
TGT
Target Corporation
40.98%-24.50%-2.27%-1.35%-34.24%32.91%40.47%100.17%4.67%-5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MSA and TGT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.25

The correlation between MSA and TGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSA:

$6.59B

TGT:

$61.37B

EPS

MSA:

$11.09

TGT:

$7.93

PE Ratio

MSA:

15.38

TGT:

17.04

PS Ratio

MSA:

2.33

TGT:

0.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSA:

$1.92B

TGT:

$105.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSA:

$897.30M

TGT:

$27.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

MSA:

$465.55M

TGT:

$8.20B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSA vs. TGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSA
MSA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

TGT
TGT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSA vs. TGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) and Target Corporation (TGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSATGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.20

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

1.72

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

3.99

-4.11

MSA vs. TGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSA Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the TGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSA and TGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSA vs. TGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSA drawdown since its inception was -70.32%, which is greater than TGT's maximum drawdown of -64.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSA and TGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSATGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.32%

-64.40%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.60%

-20.27%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.28%

-49.78%

+15.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.28%

-64.40%

+30.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.39%

-64.40%

+26.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.51%

-41.37%

+25.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-17.14%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.13%

8.72%

+2.41%

Volatility

MSA vs. TGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) is 7.00%, while Target Corporation (TGT) has a volatility of 12.13%. This indicates that MSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSATGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

12.13%

-5.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.89%

23.22%

-5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.25%

30.96%

-6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.79%

35.82%

-11.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.65%

33.45%

-4.80%

Dividends

MSA vs. TGT - Dividend Comparison

MSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than TGT's 3.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSA
MSA Safety Incorporated
1.25%1.31%1.21%1.11%1.26%1.16%1.14%1.30%1.58%1.78%1.89%2.92%
TGT
Target Corporation
3.37%4.62%3.28%3.06%2.66%1.37%1.52%2.03%3.81%3.74%3.21%2.97%

Financials

MSA vs. TGT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MSA Safety Incorporated and Target Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
463.63M
24.53B
(MSA) Total Revenue
(TGT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MSA vs. TGT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MSA Safety Incorporated and Target Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
47.4%
26.4%
Portfolio components
MSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a gross profit of 219.58M and revenue of 463.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.4%.

TGT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Target Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.46B and revenue of 24.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.4%.

MSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported an operating income of 93.01M and revenue of 463.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

TGT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Target Corporation reported an operating income of 1.30B and revenue of 24.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

MSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a net income of 71.27M and revenue of 463.63M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

TGT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Target Corporation reported a net income of 942.00M and revenue of 24.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSA and TGT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGT has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to MSA (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSA dropped -70.32% vs TGT's -64.40%.

TGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSA and TGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer