MSA vs. PEP
MSA (MSA Safety Incorporated) and PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) are both stocks. MSA operates in Security & Protection Services (Industrials), while PEP operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MSA returned 14.82%/yr vs 5.72%/yr for PEP. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MSA vs. PEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSA achieves a 19.50% return, which is significantly higher than PEP's -0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MSA has outperformed PEP with an annualized return of 14.82%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively lower 5.72% annualized return.
MSA
- 1D
- 9.13%
- 1M
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- YTD
- 19.50%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.40%
PEP
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- -6.04%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- 5.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $52.68M | $45.55M | $54.48M | |
| $1.15B | $1.26B | $1.24B |
MSA vs. PEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated | 19.50% | -2.14% | -0.71% | 18.52% | -3.15% | 2.14% | 19.79% | 36.10% | 23.61% | 13.97% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | -0.86% | -1.85% | -7.60% | -3.29% | 6.78% | 20.56% | 11.67% | 27.38% | -4.81% | 17.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSA and PEP is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.18 |
The correlation between MSA and PEP shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MSA:
$7.35B
PEP:
$190.64B
MSA:
$10.68
PEP:
$7.65
MSA:
17.81
PEP:
18.25
MSA:
0.07
PEP:
6.31
MSA:
2.87
PEP:
1.97
MSA:
$1.95B
PEP:
$96.90B
MSA:
$925.88M
PEP:
$52.29B
MSA:
$483.61M
PEP:
$18.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSA vs. PEP — Risk / Return Rank
MSA
PEP
MSA vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSA | PEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.06 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 0.27 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.71 | 0.60 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSA vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSA drawdown since its inception was -70.32%, roughly equal to the maximum PEP drawdown of -73.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSA and PEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSA | PEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.32% | -73.92% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -19.30% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.28% | -27.94% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.28% | -30.32% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.39% | -30.32% | -8.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.77% | -20.44% | +14.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -13.66% | -3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.64% | 8.67% | +2.97% |
Volatility
MSA vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison
MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) has a higher volatility of 10.41% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 7.72%. This indicates that MSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSA | PEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.41% | 7.72% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.77% | 16.85% | +2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.09% | 21.62% | +4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.16% | 18.84% | +6.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 19.87% | +8.93% |
Dividends
MSA vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison
MSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than PEP's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.26% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.30% | 1.58% | 1.78% | 1.89% | 2.92% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 4.12% | 3.92% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 3.25% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 2.76% |
Financials
MSA vs. PEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MSA Safety Incorporated and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MSA vs. PEP - Profitability Comparison
MSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a gross profit of 249.29M and revenue of 503.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
PEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.11B and revenue of 24.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
MSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported an operating income of 107.24M and revenue of 503.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.
PEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.02B and revenue of 24.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
MSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a net income of 86.19M and revenue of 503.33M, resulting in a net margin of 17.1%.
PEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00B and revenue of 24.18B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSA and PEP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSA has higher volatility (10.41%) compared to PEP (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSA dropped -70.32% vs PEP's -73.92%.
MSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSA and PEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer