MRX vs. GTX
MRX (Marex Group PLC) and GTX (Garrett Motion Inc.) are both stocks. MRX operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while GTX operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MRX vs. GTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MRX
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GTX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- 6M
- 73.78%
- YTD
- 79.86%
- 1Y
- 145.52%
- 3Y*
- 59.53%
- 5Y*
- 37.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $74.68M | $73.43M | $92.59M | |
| $42.42M | $47.88M | $48.68M |
MRX vs. GTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MRX Marex Group PLC | 6.51% |
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | -14.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRX and GTX is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2026 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
MRX:
$4.67B
GTX:
$5.81B
MRX:
$6.91
GTX:
$1.82
MRX:
9.39
GTX:
17.09
MRX:
0.18
GTX:
0.14
MRX:
0.76
GTX:
1.63
MRX:
$6.52B
GTX:
$3.75B
MRX:
$4.00B
GTX:
$881.00M
MRX:
$2.07B
GTX:
$482.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRX vs. GTX — Risk / Return Rank
MRX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GTX
MRX vs. GTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marex Group PLC (MRX) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRX | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.54 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRX vs. GTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRX drawdown since its inception was -14.41%, smaller than the maximum GTX drawdown of -93.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRX and GTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRX | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | -93.91% | +79.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -14.02% | +6.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -55.52% | +49.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.19% | — |
Volatility
MRX vs. GTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRX | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.03% | 49.35% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.03% | 41.63% | +15.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.03% | 63.83% | -6.80% |
Dividends
MRX vs. GTX - Dividend Comparison
MRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 0.96% | 1.49% |
MRX Marex Group PLC | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MRX vs. GTX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marex Group PLC and Garrett Motion Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MRX vs. GTX - Profitability Comparison
MRX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marex Group PLC reported a gross profit of 2.52B and revenue of 3.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.5%.
GTX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 976.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.7%.
MRX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marex Group PLC reported an operating income of 1.06B and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.9%.
GTX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported an operating income of -2.00M and revenue of 976.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.2%.
MRX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marex Group PLC reported a net income of 231.50M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
GTX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a net income of 101.00M and revenue of 976.00M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRX and GTX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MRX and GTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer