MRX vs. GTX
MRX (Marex Group PLC) and GTX (Garrett Motion Inc.) are both stocks. MRX operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while GTX operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past year, MRX returned 69.47% vs 250.41% for GTX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MRX vs. GTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRX achieves a 71.45% return, which is significantly lower than GTX's 99.14% return.
MRX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 22.74%
- YTD
- 71.45%
- 6M
- 66.88%
- 1Y
- 69.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 99.14%
- 6M
- 96.22%
- 1Y
- 250.41%
- 3Y*
- 68.91%
- 5Y*
- 34.36%
- 10Y*
- —
MRX vs. GTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MRX Marex Group PLC | 71.45% | 25.07% | 61.52% |
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 99.14% | 97.23% | -8.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRX and GTX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2024 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
MRX:
$4.97B
GTX:
$6.66B
MRX:
$7.12
GTX:
$1.72
MRX:
9.17
GTX:
20.06
MRX:
0.18
GTX:
0.16
MRX:
0.74
GTX:
2.54
MRX:
$6.52B
GTX:
$2.71B
MRX:
$4.00B
GTX:
$855.00M
MRX:
$2.07B
GTX:
$452.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRX vs. GTX — Risk / Return Rank
MRX
GTX
MRX vs. GTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marex Group PLC (MRX) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRX | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.85 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 12.69 | -10.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 41.29 | -35.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRX vs. GTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRX drawdown since its inception was -41.13%, smaller than the maximum GTX drawdown of -93.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRX and GTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRX | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.13% | -93.91% | +52.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.90% | -19.87% | -10.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.35% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -56.17% | +44.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.76% | 6.10% | +5.66% |
Volatility
MRX vs. GTX - Volatility Comparison
Marex Group PLC (MRX) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) have volatilities of 12.86% and 12.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRX | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.86% | 12.34% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.49% | 35.34% | -5.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.03% | 48.06% | -8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.65% | 41.54% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.65% | 64.01% | -22.36% |
Dividends
MRX vs. GTX - Dividend Comparison
MRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than GTX's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 0.87% | 1.49% | 0.00% |
MRX Marex Group PLC | 0.93% | 1.54% | 0.90% |
Financials
MRX vs. GTX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marex Group PLC and Garrett Motion Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MRX and GTX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRX has higher volatility (12.86%) compared to GTX (12.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRX dropped -41.13% vs GTX's -93.91%.
GTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.26 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRX and GTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer