MRVL vs. CRDO
MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) and CRDO (Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MRVL in Semiconductors, CRDO in Communication Equipment. Over the past 3 years, MRVL returned 69.41%/yr vs 138.04%/yr for CRDO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MRVL vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRVL achieves a 240.32% return, which is significantly higher than CRDO's 54.47% return.
MRVL
- 1D
- 9.63%
- 1M
- 69.78%
- YTD
- 240.32%
- 6M
- 214.35%
- 1Y
- 323.75%
- 3Y*
- 69.41%
- 5Y*
- 42.37%
- 10Y*
- 41.26%
CRDO
- 1D
- 7.43%
- 1M
- 17.91%
- YTD
- 54.47%
- 6M
- 24.21%
- 1Y
- 204.65%
- 3Y*
- 138.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MRVL vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 240.32% | -22.82% | 83.79% | 63.68% | -42.72% |
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 54.47% | 114.09% | 245.20% | 46.28% | 14.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRVL and CRDO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022 | 0.55 |
The correlation between MRVL and CRDO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
MRVL:
$258.03B
CRDO:
$42.83B
MRVL:
$2.90
CRDO:
$2.50
MRVL:
99.74
CRDO:
89.06
MRVL:
0.18
CRDO:
0.08
MRVL:
28.91
CRDO:
31.50
MRVL:
14.17
CRDO:
20.75
MRVL:
$8.72B
CRDO:
$1.34B
MRVL:
$4.41B
CRDO:
$908.35M
MRVL:
$4.27B
CRDO:
$463.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRVL vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank
MRVL
CRDO
MRVL vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRVL | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.32 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.37 | 3.84 | +8.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.64 | 9.27 | +19.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRVL | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.70 | 2.43 | +2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 1.20 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
MRVL vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRVL drawdown since its inception was -91.60%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVL and CRDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRVL | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.60% | -62.04% | -29.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.36% | -53.59% | +27.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.79% | -61.05% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.72% | -5.83% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.77% | -19.46% | -27.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.37% | 22.17% | -10.80% |
Volatility
MRVL vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison
Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a higher volatility of 38.50% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) at 28.82%. This indicates that MRVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRVL | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.50% | 28.82% | +9.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.32% | 64.61% | -10.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.56% | 85.09% | -15.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.51% | 81.41% | -19.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.77% | 81.41% | -29.64% |
Dividends
MRVL vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison
MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 0.08% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
Financials
MRVL vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marvell Technology, Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MRVL vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
CRDO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
CRDO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
CRDO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRVL and CRDO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRVL has higher volatility (38.50%) compared to CRDO (28.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRVL dropped -91.60% vs CRDO's -62.04%.
MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRVL and CRDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer