MRVL vs. CLX
MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) and CLX (The Clorox Company) are both stocks. MRVL operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while CLX operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MRVL returned 40.68%/yr vs -0.20%/yr for CLX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MRVL vs. CLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRVL achieves a 229.54% return, which is significantly higher than CLX's -1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MRVL has outperformed CLX with an annualized return of 40.68%, while CLX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.20% annualized return.
MRVL
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 58.12%
- YTD
- 229.54%
- 6M
- 231.70%
- 1Y
- 317.41%
- 3Y*
- 64.86%
- 5Y*
- 40.49%
- 10Y*
- 40.68%
CLX
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- -4.70%
- 1Y
- -17.78%
- 3Y*
- -11.57%
- 5Y*
- -8.21%
- 10Y*
- -0.20%
MRVL vs. CLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 229.54% | -22.82% | 83.79% | 63.68% | -57.48% | 84.62% | 80.25% | 65.74% | -23.62% | 56.89% |
CLX The Clorox Company | -1.69% | -35.59% | 17.72% | 4.99% | -17.00% | -11.50% | 34.46% | 2.23% | 6.55% | 27.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRVL and CLX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000 | 0.15 |
The correlation between MRVL and CLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MRVL:
$249.86B
CLX:
$11.79B
MRVL:
$2.90
CLX:
$6.17
MRVL:
96.58
CLX:
15.70
MRVL:
0.18
CLX:
0.36
MRVL:
27.99
CLX:
1.76
MRVL:
$8.72B
CLX:
$6.76B
MRVL:
$4.41B
CLX:
$2.96B
MRVL:
$4.27B
CLX:
$1.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRVL vs. CLX — Risk / Return Rank
MRVL
CLX
MRVL vs. CLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and The Clorox Company (CLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRVL | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 0.89 | +0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.57 | -0.65 | +12.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.42 | -1.33 | +27.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRVL vs. CLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRVL drawdown since its inception was -91.60%, which is greater than CLX's maximum drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVL and CLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRVL | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.60% | -56.34% | -35.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.36% | -31.52% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.79% | -46.11% | -14.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.88% | -46.11% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.88% | -56.34% | -5.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.61% | -50.92% | +39.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.74% | -13.43% | -33.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.52% | 15.49% | -3.97% |
Volatility
MRVL vs. CLX - Volatility Comparison
Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a higher volatility of 40.61% compared to The Clorox Company (CLX) at 10.45%. This indicates that MRVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRVL | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.61% | 10.45% | +30.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.42% | 23.46% | +31.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.94% | 28.17% | +42.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.82% | 26.09% | +35.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.94% | 24.51% | +27.43% |
Dividends
MRVL vs. CLX - Dividend Comparison
MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than CLX's 5.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLX The Clorox Company | 5.12% | 4.88% | 2.98% | 3.34% | 3.33% | 2.60% | 2.15% | 2.63% | 2.41% | 2.21% | 2.62% | 2.38% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 0.09% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
Financials
MRVL vs. CLX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marvell Technology, Inc. and The Clorox Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MRVL vs. CLX - Profitability Comparison
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
CLX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Clorox Company reported a gross profit of 722.00M and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.2%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
CLX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Clorox Company reported an operating income of 466.00M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.9%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
CLX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Clorox Company reported a net income of 187.00M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRVL and CLX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRVL has higher volatility (40.61%) compared to CLX (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRVL dropped -91.60% vs CLX's -56.34%.
MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRVL and CLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer