PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRVL vs. BALL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MRVL vs. BALL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Ball Corporation (BALL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRVL achieves a 229.54% return, which is significantly higher than BALL's 8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MRVL has outperformed BALL with an annualized return of 40.68%, while BALL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.84% annualized return.


MRVL

1D
-0.36%
1M
58.12%
YTD
229.54%
6M
231.70%
1Y
317.41%
3Y*
64.86%
5Y*
40.49%
10Y*
40.68%

BALL

1D
1.14%
1M
3.60%
YTD
8.29%
6M
12.67%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
-5.69%
10Y*
5.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRVL vs. BALL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
229.54%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-23.62%56.89%
BALL
Ball Corporation
8.29%-2.43%-2.96%14.15%-46.23%4.12%45.19%41.83%22.65%1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MRVL and BALL is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between MRVL and BALL has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MRVL:

$249.86B

BALL:

$15.24B

EPS

MRVL:

$2.90

BALL:

$3.45

PE Ratio

MRVL:

96.58

BALL:

16.52

PEG Ratio

MRVL:

0.18

BALL:

0.17

PS Ratio

MRVL:

27.99

BALL:

1.13

PB Ratio

MRVL:

13.72

BALL:

2.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

MRVL:

$8.72B

BALL:

$13.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MRVL:

$4.41B

BALL:

$1.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

MRVL:

$4.27B

BALL:

$1.65B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRVL vs. BALL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BALL
BALL Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BALL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BALL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALL Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRVL vs. BALL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Ball Corporation (BALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRVLBALLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.06

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.57

0.22

+11.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.42

0.38

+26.04

MRVL vs. BALL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRVL Sharpe Ratio is 4.30, which is higher than the BALL Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRVL and BALL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRVL vs. BALL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRVL drawdown since its inception was -91.60%, which is greater than BALL's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVL and BALL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRVLBALLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.60%

-55.09%

-36.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.36%

-21.96%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.79%

-35.62%

-25.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.88%

-55.09%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

-55.09%

-6.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.61%

-37.91%

+26.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.74%

-16.49%

-30.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.52%

12.70%

-1.18%

Volatility

MRVL vs. BALL - Volatility Comparison

Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a higher volatility of 40.61% compared to Ball Corporation (BALL) at 7.41%. This indicates that MRVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRVLBALLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.61%

7.41%

+33.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.42%

19.80%

+35.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.94%

26.16%

+44.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.82%

30.42%

+31.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.94%

28.33%

+23.61%

Dividends

MRVL vs. BALL - Dividend Comparison

MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than BALL's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BALL
Ball Corporation
1.40%1.51%1.45%1.39%1.56%0.73%0.64%0.85%0.87%0.96%0.69%0.71%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.09%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Financials

MRVL vs. BALL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marvell Technology, Inc. and Ball Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
2.42B
3.60B
(MRVL) Total Revenue
(BALL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MRVL vs. BALL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Marvell Technology, Inc. and Ball Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
52.2%
0
Portfolio components
MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

BALL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ball Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

BALL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ball Corporation reported an operating income of 205.00M and revenue of 3.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

BALL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ball Corporation reported a net income of 205.00M and revenue of 3.60B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MRVL and BALL have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (40.61%) compared to BALL (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRVL dropped -91.60% vs BALL's -55.09%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRVL and BALL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer