MRU.TO vs. FNV.TO
MRU.TO (Metro Inc.) and FNV.TO (Franco-Nevada Corporation) are both stocks. MRU.TO operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while FNV.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, MRU.TO returned 9.33%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for FNV.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MRU.TO vs. FNV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRU.TO achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than FNV.TO's 7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MRU.TO has underperformed FNV.TO with an annualized return of 9.33%, while FNV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return.
MRU.TO
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- -6.40%
- 6M
- -6.10%
- 1Y
- -11.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
FNV.TO
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 3.15%
- 1Y
- 33.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
MRU.TO vs. FNV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRU.TO Metro Inc. | -6.40% | 11.26% | 33.74% | -6.94% | 13.16% | 20.54% | 7.62% | 14.95% | 19.73% | 1.79% |
FNV.TO Franco-Nevada Corporation | 7.16% | 69.89% | 16.50% | -19.65% | 6.38% | 10.37% | 19.99% | 41.29% | -3.60% | 26.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRU.TO and FNV.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2007 | 0.07 |
The correlation between MRU.TO and FNV.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MRU.TO:
CA$19.52B
FNV.TO:
CA$58.68B
MRU.TO:
CA$4.68
FNV.TO:
$7.09
MRU.TO:
19.59
FNV.TO:
30.23
MRU.TO:
2.15
FNV.TO:
0.63
MRU.TO:
0.88
FNV.TO:
19.69
MRU.TO:
2.81
FNV.TO:
5.11
MRU.TO:
CA$22.38B
FNV.TO:
$2.10B
MRU.TO:
CA$4.16B
FNV.TO:
$1.61B
MRU.TO:
CA$2.09B
FNV.TO:
$1.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRU.TO vs. FNV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MRU.TO
FNV.TO
MRU.TO vs. FNV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metro Inc. (MRU.TO) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRU.TO | FNV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.18 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 1.38 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 3.26 | -4.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRU.TO vs. FNV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRU.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, smaller than the maximum FNV.TO drawdown of -47.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRU.TO and FNV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRU.TO | FNV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.08% | -47.77% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.96% | -24.10% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.66% | -27.39% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.66% | -33.81% | +16.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.06% | -38.28% | +19.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.69% | -20.55% | +6.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -12.27% | +5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.10% | 10.27% | -0.17% |
Volatility
MRU.TO vs. FNV.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Metro Inc. (MRU.TO) is 6.49%, while Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO) has a volatility of 13.90%. This indicates that MRU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRU.TO | FNV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 13.90% | -7.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 30.24% | -16.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.24% | 36.12% | -16.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 28.66% | -11.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 28.80% | -11.53% |
Dividends
MRU.TO vs. FNV.TO - Dividend Comparison
MRU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than FNV.TO's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNV.TO Franco-Nevada Corporation | 0.75% | 0.74% | 1.17% | 1.25% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 0.86% | 0.74% | 1.07% | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.42% |
MRU.TO Metro Inc. | 1.70% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.76% | 1.47% | 1.49% | 1.58% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.39% | 1.20% |
Financials
MRU.TO vs. FNV.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metro Inc. and Franco-Nevada Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MRU.TO vs. FNV.TO - Profitability Comparison
MRU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metro Inc. reported a gross profit of 882.80M and revenue of 5.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.
FNV.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a gross profit of 517.08M and revenue of 639.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.
MRU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metro Inc. reported an operating income of 343.90M and revenue of 5.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
FNV.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported an operating income of 501.94M and revenue of 639.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.5%.
MRU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metro Inc. reported a net income of 246.50M and revenue of 5.11B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
FNV.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a net income of 460.92M and revenue of 639.45M, resulting in a net margin of 72.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRU.TO and FNV.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MRU.TO and FNV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer