PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRSK vs. WTMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRSK vs. WTMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRSK achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than WTMF's 8.50% return.


MRSK

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.38%
YTD
5.23%
6M
5.74%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*

WTMF

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.05%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.44%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
3.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRSK vs. WTMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
5.23%11.93%14.62%13.29%-11.86%20.74%16.42%
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
8.50%12.17%3.20%16.72%-6.52%9.48%6.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MRSK and WTMF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.34

The correlation between MRSK and WTMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MRSK vs. WTMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MRSK
WTMF

Technology

35.7%
17.0%

Financial Services

12.0%
15.8%

Communication Services

10.8%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.4%

Healthcare

8.6%
16.5%

Industrials

8.2%
17.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
2.4%

Energy

3.6%
6.1%

Utilities

2.4%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
6.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.8%

Technology

MRSK
35.7%
WTMF
17.0%

Financial Services

MRSK
12.0%
WTMF
15.8%

Communication Services

MRSK
10.8%
WTMF
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

MRSK
10.1%
WTMF
8.4%

Healthcare

MRSK
8.6%
WTMF
16.5%

Industrials

MRSK
8.2%
WTMF
17.7%

Consumer Defensive

MRSK
4.9%
WTMF
2.4%

Energy

MRSK
3.6%
WTMF
6.1%

Utilities

MRSK
2.4%
WTMF
2.9%

Real Estate

MRSK
1.9%
WTMF
6.1%

Basic Materials

MRSK
1.8%
WTMF
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRSK vs. WTMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRSK
MRSK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

WTMF
WTMF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WTMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRSK vs. WTMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRSKWTMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

2.62

-0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

3.60

-1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

5.61

-3.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.92

25.08

-15.15

MRSK vs. WTMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the WTMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRSK and WTMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRSKWTMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.62

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.66

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.15

+0.81

Drawdowns

MRSK vs. WTMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRSK drawdown since its inception was -14.70%, smaller than the maximum WTMF drawdown of -30.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSK and WTMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRSKWTMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.70%

-30.79%

+16.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-4.04%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.22%

-9.93%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.70%

-13.21%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.13%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-17.71%

+14.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

0.90%

+1.04%

Volatility

MRSK vs. WTMF - Volatility Comparison

Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) at 1.61%. This indicates that MRSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRSKWTMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

1.61%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

6.84%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

8.63%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.67%

9.46%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.84%

8.07%

+3.77%

MRSK vs. WTMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRSK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than WTMF's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRSK vs. WTMF - Dividend Comparison

MRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than WTMF's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MRSK
Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF
0.36%0.37%0.44%0.60%1.11%14.20%4.29%0.00%0.00%
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.80%3.04%3.57%4.74%5.29%14.71%0.47%1.63%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRSK and WTMF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRSK has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to WTMF (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSK dropped -14.70% vs WTMF's -30.79%.

On 5-year performance, MRSK leads with 8.16% vs 6.17% for WTMF. On fees, WTMF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MRSK has performed better with a 8.16% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTMF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRSK.

WTMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.36% for MRSK.

They also come from different issuers: Toews Corp. and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MRSK and 0.65% for WTMF.

WTMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRSK and WTMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer