MRSK vs. PHDG
MRSK (Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF) and PHDG (Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MRSK is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Toews Corp., while PHDG is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index. MRSK is actively managed, while PHDG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MRSK returned 8.16%/yr vs 5.45%/yr for PHDG. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MRSK charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PHDG.
Performance
MRSK vs. PHDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRSK achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than PHDG's 13.79% return.
MRSK
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 5.74%
- 1Y
- 19.20%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- —
PHDG
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 5.45%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
MRSK vs. PHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSK Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF | 5.23% | 11.93% | 14.62% | 13.29% | -11.86% | 20.74% | 16.42% |
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 13.79% | 2.72% | 10.95% | 8.18% | -14.09% | 15.67% | 6.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRSK and PHDG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.58 |
The correlation between MRSK and PHDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
MRSK vs. PHDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MRSK
PHDG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
MRSK
PHDG
Financial Services
MRSK
PHDG
Communication Services
MRSK
PHDG
Consumer Cyclical
MRSK
PHDG
Healthcare
MRSK
PHDG
Industrials
MRSK
PHDG
Consumer Defensive
MRSK
PHDG
Energy
MRSK
PHDG
Utilities
MRSK
PHDG
Real Estate
MRSK
PHDG
Basic Materials
MRSK
PHDG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRSK vs. PHDG — Risk / Return Rank
MRSK
PHDG
MRSK vs. PHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRSK | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 2.88 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 4.23 | -1.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.53 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 7.19 | -4.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 26.70 | -16.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRSK | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.88 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.50 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.53 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
MRSK vs. PHDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRSK drawdown since its inception was -14.70%, smaller than the maximum PHDG drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSK and PHDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRSK | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.70% | -17.70% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -3.52% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.22% | -14.78% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.70% | -17.06% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.87% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -6.25% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 0.95% | +0.99% |
Volatility
MRSK vs. PHDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF (MRSK) is 2.42%, while Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that MRSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRSK | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 3.07% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.29% | 6.64% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 8.81% | +1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 10.92% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 11.92% | -0.08% |
MRSK vs. PHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRSK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PHDG's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRSK vs. PHDG - Dividend Comparison
MRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than PHDG's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSK Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF | 0.36% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.11% | 14.20% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 1.86% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 1.35% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 1.80% | 1.56% | 1.83% | 2.29% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRSK and PHDG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHDG has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to MRSK (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSK dropped -14.70% vs PHDG's -17.70%.
On 5-year performance, MRSK leads with 8.16% vs 5.45% for PHDG. On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MRSK has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MRSK has performed better with a 8.16% return vs 5.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRSK.
PHDG has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.36% for MRSK.
MRSK is categorized as Hedge Fund, while PHDG is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Toews Corp. and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MRSK and 0.39% for PHDG.
PHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRSK and PHDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer