MRLIX vs. GTLLX
MRLIX (AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund) and GTLLX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MRLIX returned 12.61%/yr vs 16.11%/yr for GTLLX. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. MRLIX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GTLLX.
Performance
MRLIX vs. GTLLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRLIX achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than GTLLX's 20.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MRLIX has underperformed GTLLX with an annualized return of 12.61%, while GTLLX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.11% annualized return.
MRLIX
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- -6.89%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.94%
GTLLX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 19.59%
- YTD
- 20.55%
- 1Y
- 32.78%
- 3Y*
- 22.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MRLIX vs. GTLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRLIX AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund | 3.11% | -4.22% | 9.25% | 25.51% | -16.98% | 30.76% | 23.92% | 47.97% | -6.66% | 22.50% |
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | 20.55% | 17.44% | 20.71% | 27.10% | -21.69% | 32.91% | 18.80% | 34.86% | -5.23% | 27.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRLIX and GTLLX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2009 | 0.95 |
The correlation between MRLIX and GTLLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRLIX vs. GTLLX — Risk / Return Rank
MRLIX
GTLLX
MRLIX vs. GTLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund (MRLIX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRLIX | GTLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.27 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 2.79 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 10.35 | -11.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRLIX vs. GTLLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRLIX drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, smaller than the maximum GTLLX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRLIX and GTLLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRLIX | GTLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.16% | -54.32% | +20.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.75% | -10.76% | -12.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.51% | -41.54% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | -41.54% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.16% | -41.54% | +7.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.43% | -3.65% | -11.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -8.54% | +3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.62% | 2.89% | +9.73% |
Volatility
MRLIX vs. GTLLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund (MRLIX) is 3.94%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that MRLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRLIX | GTLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 5.23% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 15.42% | -3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.89% | 18.83% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 29.23% | -10.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 25.10% | -5.39% |
MRLIX vs. GTLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRLIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than GTLLX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRLIX vs. GTLLX - Dividend Comparison
MRLIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GTLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | 12.72% | 15.33% | 40.42% | 4.91% | 7.93% | 20.20% | 15.12% | 14.10% | 16.97% | 2.29% | 0.58% | 0.61% |
MRLIX AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.52% | 7.77% | 7.44% | 8.36% | 5.23% | 17.34% | 24.83% | 3.35% | 2.29% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRLIX and GTLLX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTLLX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to MRLIX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRLIX dropped -34.16% vs GTLLX's -54.32%.
GTLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRLIX and GTLLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer