MRLIX vs. MEQFX
MRLIX (AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund) and MEQFX (AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund) are both mutual funds - MRLIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG, while MEQFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, MRLIX returned 12.86%/yr vs 10.64%/yr for MEQFX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MRLIX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for MEQFX.
Performance
MRLIX vs. MEQFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRLIX achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly higher than MEQFX's -1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MRLIX has outperformed MEQFX with an annualized return of 12.86%, while MEQFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.64% annualized return.
MRLIX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- -5.27%
- 3Y*
- 6.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
MEQFX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- -4.68%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 1Y
- -8.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
MRLIX vs. MEQFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRLIX AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund | 4.52% | -4.22% | 9.25% | 25.51% | -16.98% | 30.76% | 23.92% | 47.97% | -6.66% | 22.50% |
MEQFX AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund | -1.58% | -2.58% | 24.99% | 19.53% | -9.50% | 43.58% | -4.00% | 16.01% | 8.16% | 15.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRLIX and MEQFX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2009 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MRLIX and MEQFX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRLIX vs. MEQFX — Risk / Return Rank
MRLIX
MEQFX
MRLIX vs. MEQFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund (MRLIX) and AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRLIX | MEQFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.91 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | -0.55 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | -0.97 | +0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRLIX vs. MEQFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRLIX drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, smaller than the maximum MEQFX drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRLIX and MEQFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRLIX | MEQFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.16% | -55.38% | +21.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.75% | -17.43% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.51% | -17.43% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | -19.48% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.16% | -28.69% | -5.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.27% | -13.16% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -12.19% | +6.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.17% | 9.94% | +2.23% |
Volatility
MRLIX vs. MEQFX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund (MRLIX) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX) at 4.41%. This indicates that MRLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEQFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRLIX | MEQFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 4.41% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 9.71% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.71% | 17.14% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 17.54% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 19.59% | +0.10% |
MRLIX vs. MEQFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRLIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than MEQFX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRLIX vs. MEQFX - Dividend Comparison
Neither MRLIX nor MEQFX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEQFX AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.48% | 0.98% | 2.13% | 27.90% | 0.00% | 9.17% | 3.40% | 30.28% | 5.96% | 11.63% |
MRLIX AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.52% | 7.77% | 7.44% | 8.36% | 5.23% | 17.34% | 24.83% | 3.35% | 2.29% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRLIX and MEQFX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRLIX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to MEQFX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRLIX dropped -34.16% vs MEQFX's -55.38%.
MRLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRLIX and MEQFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer