MRLIX vs. ACIHX
MRLIX (AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund) and ACIHX (American Century Investments Growth Fund G Class) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, MRLIX returned 4.79%/yr vs 17.45%/yr for ACIHX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MRLIX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for ACIHX.
Performance
MRLIX vs. ACIHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRLIX achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly higher than ACIHX's 1.37% return.
MRLIX
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- -6.89%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.94%
ACIHX
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 11.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MRLIX vs. ACIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRLIX AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund | 3.11% | -4.22% | 9.25% | 25.51% | 1.06% |
ACIHX American Century Investments Growth Fund G Class | 1.37% | 16.26% | 27.35% | 44.64% | -6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRLIX and ACIHX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MRLIX and ACIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRLIX vs. ACIHX — Risk / Return Rank
MRLIX
ACIHX
MRLIX vs. ACIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund (MRLIX) and American Century Investments Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRLIX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.11 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 0.60 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 1.82 | -2.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRLIX vs. ACIHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRLIX drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, which is greater than ACIHX's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRLIX and ACIHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRLIX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.16% | -24.00% | -10.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.75% | -16.40% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.51% | -24.00% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.43% | -7.43% | -8.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -4.91% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.62% | 5.38% | +7.24% |
Volatility
MRLIX vs. ACIHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund (MRLIX) is 3.94%, while American Century Investments Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that MRLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRLIX | ACIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 5.54% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 13.85% | -2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.89% | 17.44% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 21.07% | -2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 21.07% | -1.36% |
MRLIX vs. ACIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRLIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than ACIHX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRLIX vs. ACIHX - Dividend Comparison
MRLIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIHX American Century Investments Growth Fund G Class | 15.73% | 15.95% | 5.65% | 4.61% | 2.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MRLIX AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.52% | 7.77% | 7.44% | 8.36% | 5.23% | 17.34% | 24.83% | 3.35% | 2.29% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRLIX and ACIHX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACIHX has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to MRLIX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRLIX dropped -34.16% vs ACIHX's -24.00%.
ACIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRLIX and ACIHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer