PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRK vs. WPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MRK vs. WPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRK achieves a 14.39% return, which is significantly higher than WPM's -1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MRK has underperformed WPM with an annualized return of 11.61%, while WPM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.95% annualized return.


MRK

1D
-1.05%
1M
7.31%
YTD
14.39%
6M
22.75%
1Y
56.85%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
11.61%

WPM

1D
-1.17%
1M
-17.15%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
9.78%
1Y
30.34%
3Y*
38.10%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
19.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRK vs. WPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
14.39%9.79%-6.26%1.01%49.42%1.75%-7.20%22.27%39.95%-1.49%
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
-1.95%110.52%15.24%27.91%-7.53%4.22%41.82%54.62%-10.04%16.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MRK and WPM is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MRK:

$295.45B

WPM:

$52.26B

EPS

MRK:

$3.58

WPM:

$3.96

PE Ratio

MRK:

33.34

WPM:

29.02

PEG Ratio

MRK:

0.03

WPM:

0.78

PS Ratio

MRK:

4.54

WPM:

19.02

PB Ratio

MRK:

6.44

WPM:

5.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

MRK:

$65.59B

WPM:

$2.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MRK:

$49.79B

WPM:

$2.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

MRK:

$22.69B

WPM:

$2.38B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRK vs. WPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRK
MRK Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRK Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

WPM
WPM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
WPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
WPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRK vs. WPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRKWPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.15

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.03

0.99

+4.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

2.64

+9.95

MRK vs. WPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRK Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the WPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRK and WPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRKWPMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

0.67

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.55

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.68

-0.19

Drawdowns

MRK vs. WPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRK drawdown since its inception was -68.61%, which is greater than WPM's maximum drawdown of -48.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRK and WPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRKWPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.61%

-48.64%

-19.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-30.84%

+19.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.44%

-30.84%

-12.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.44%

-43.29%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.44%

-48.64%

+5.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-30.47%

+25.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.84%

-18.85%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

11.53%

-7.00%

Volatility

MRK vs. WPM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) is 9.44%, while Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) has a volatility of 16.65%. This indicates that MRK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRKWPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.44%

16.65%

-7.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.14%

38.92%

-20.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.30%

45.46%

-18.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.71%

35.33%

-11.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.96%

36.72%

-13.76%

Dividends

MRK vs. WPM - Dividend Comparison

MRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than WPM's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.78%3.12%3.14%2.72%2.52%3.41%3.03%2.48%2.60%3.36%3.14%3.43%
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.63%0.56%1.10%1.22%1.54%1.33%1.01%1.21%1.84%1.49%1.09%0.00%

Financials

MRK vs. WPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Merck & Co., Inc. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
16.29B
888.98M
(MRK) Total Revenue
(WPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MRK vs. WPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Merck & Co., Inc. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
81.9%
77.5%
Portfolio components
MRK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.34B and revenue of 16.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

WPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 689.26M and revenue of 888.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.

MRK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported an operating income of -1.88B and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in an operating margin of -11.6%.

WPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 666.92M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.

MRK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported a net income of -4.24B and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in a net margin of -26.0%.

WPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 573.98M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MRK and WPM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WPM has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to MRK (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRK dropped -68.61% vs WPM's -48.64%.

MRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRK and WPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer