MRK vs. URA
MRK (Merck & Co., Inc.) is a stock, while URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Over the past 10 years, MRK returned 11.59%/yr vs 15.90%/yr for URA. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MRK vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRK achieves a 13.94% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 6.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MRK has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 11.59%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.90% annualized return.
MRK
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 13.94%
- 6M
- 20.60%
- 1Y
- 50.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.81%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
URA
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -13.30%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 32.17%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
MRK vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 13.94% | 9.79% | -6.26% | 1.01% | 49.42% | 1.75% | -7.20% | 22.27% | 39.95% | -1.49% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 6.53% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -22.11% | 19.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRK and URA is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010 | 0.18 |
The correlation between MRK and URA shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (3 years) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRK vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
MRK
URA
MRK vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRK | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.14 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.49 | 1.04 | +3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 2.30 | +8.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRK vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRK drawdown since its inception was -68.61%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRK and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRK | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.61% | -93.54% | +24.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -31.48% | +20.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.44% | -37.81% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.44% | -37.90% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.44% | -61.45% | +18.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.03% | -48.34% | +43.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.83% | -74.94% | +56.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 14.12% | -9.58% |
Volatility
MRK vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) is 9.57%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 17.69%. This indicates that MRK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRK | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.57% | 17.69% | -8.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.04% | 39.95% | -21.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.18% | 51.24% | -24.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 43.96% | -20.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 37.91% | -14.95% |
Dividends
MRK vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
MRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than URA's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 2.79% | 3.12% | 3.14% | 2.72% | 2.52% | 3.41% | 3.03% | 2.48% | 2.60% | 3.36% | 3.14% | 3.43% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.58% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRK and URA have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to MRK (9.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRK dropped -68.61% vs URA's -93.54%.
MRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRK and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer