PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRGR vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRGR vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRGR achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, MRGR has outperformed UUP with an annualized return of 3.57%, while UUP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.17% annualized return.


MRGR

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.45%
6M
1.87%
YTD
2.67%
1Y
11.25%
3Y*
8.81%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
3.57%

UUP

1D
0.39%
1M
1.97%
6M
4.47%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRGR vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRGR
Proshares Merger ETF
2.67%11.99%5.32%4.94%-4.81%6.58%1.99%4.31%3.42%2.08%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
5.44%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%7.05%-9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MRGR and UUP is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2012

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRGR vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRGR
MRGR Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MRGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRGR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MRGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRGR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRGR vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRGRUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.25

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.73

2.28

+6.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.87

6.26

+17.61

MRGR vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRGR Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRGR and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRGR vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRGR drawdown since its inception was -13.23%, smaller than the maximum UUP drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRGR and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRGRUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.23%

-22.19%

+8.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-3.65%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.10%

-10.05%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.40%

-10.37%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.23%

-14.24%

+1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.26%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-8.88%

+5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

1.33%

-0.86%

Volatility

MRGR vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR) is 0.91%, while Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that MRGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRGRUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

1.45%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

4.34%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24%

6.03%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.81%

7.22%

-3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.16%

6.90%

-1.74%

MRGR vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MRGR and UUP have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

MRGR vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

MRGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than UUP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRGR
Proshares Merger ETF
2.96%3.12%3.21%2.11%0.61%0.59%0.00%0.78%1.39%0.36%0.74%0.34%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.25%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRGR and UUP have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UUP has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to MRGR (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRGR dropped -13.23% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 10-year performance, MRGR leads with 3.57% vs 3.17% for UUP. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, MRGR has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MRGR has performed better with a 3.57% return vs 3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MRGR and UUP have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

UUP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 2.96% for MRGR.

MRGR is categorized as Hedge Fund, while UUP is Currency. MRGR tracks S&P Merger Arbitrage Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco.

MRGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRGR and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer