MRF.NS vs. ^NIFTY200
MRF.NS (MRF Limited) is a stock, while ^NIFTY200 (NIFTY 200) is an index. Over the past 10 years, MRF.NS returned 14.31%/yr vs 12.20%/yr for ^NIFTY200. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MRF.NS vs. ^NIFTY200 - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRF.NS achieves a -18.41% return, which is significantly lower than ^NIFTY200's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MRF.NS has outperformed ^NIFTY200 with an annualized return of 14.31%, while ^NIFTY200 has yielded a comparatively lower 12.20% annualized return.
MRF.NS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- -18.41%
- 6M
- -18.60%
- 1Y
- -11.01%
- 3Y*
- 8.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
^NIFTY200
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -6.82%
- 1Y
- -2.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
MRF.NS vs. ^NIFTY200 - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRF.NS MRF Limited | -18.41% | 17.19% | 0.96% | 46.61% | 20.95% | -3.01% | 14.39% | -0.87% | -7.35% | 48.08% |
^NIFTY200 NIFTY 200 | -6.77% | 8.40% | 13.63% | 23.49% | 3.65% | 27.47% | 15.62% | 8.68% | -1.01% | 33.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRF.NS and ^NIFTY200 is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2004 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRF.NS vs. ^NIFTY200 — Risk / Return Rank
MRF.NS
^NIFTY200
MRF.NS vs. ^NIFTY200 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRF Limited (MRF.NS) and NIFTY 200 (^NIFTY200). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRF.NS | ^NIFTY200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.99 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | -0.11 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | -0.35 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRF.NS | ^NIFTY200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | -0.12 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.73 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.76 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.59 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
MRF.NS vs. ^NIFTY200 - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRF.NS drawdown since its inception was -80.98%, which is greater than ^NIFTY200's maximum drawdown of -64.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRF.NS and ^NIFTY200.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRF.NS | ^NIFTY200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.98% | -64.04% | -16.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.95% | -14.89% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.79% | -18.08% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.79% | -18.15% | -13.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | -38.22% | +2.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.15% | -8.38% | -14.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -10.96% | -5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.41% | 4.62% | +6.79% |
Volatility
MRF.NS vs. ^NIFTY200 - Volatility Comparison
MRF Limited (MRF.NS) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to NIFTY 200 (^NIFTY200) at 4.01%. This indicates that MRF.NS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NIFTY200 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRF.NS | ^NIFTY200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 4.01% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.96% | 12.10% | +5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.32% | 13.72% | +10.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 14.32% | +8.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.56% | 16.28% | +9.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRF.NS and ^NIFTY200 have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MRF.NS and ^NIFTY200
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer