PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRF.NS vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MRF.NS vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₹10,000 investment in MRF Limited (MRF.NS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MRF.NS is traded in INR, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to INR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRF.NS achieves a -18.41% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 16.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MRF.NS has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 14.31%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 74.14% annualized return.


MRF.NS

1D
-0.06%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-18.41%
6M
-18.60%
1Y
-11.01%
3Y*
8.99%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
14.31%

NVDA

1D
-7.02%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
16.36%
6M
18.89%
1Y
62.34%
3Y*
82.93%
5Y*
72.40%
10Y*
74.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRF.NS vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRF.NS
MRF Limited
-18.41%17.19%0.96%46.61%20.95%-3.01%14.39%-0.87%-7.35%48.08%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
16.36%45.57%179.47%241.36%-44.92%129.97%127.89%81.43%-24.55%70.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MRF.NS and NVDA is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRF.NS vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRF.NS
MRF.NS Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MRF.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRF.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRF.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MRF.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRF.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRF.NS vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRF Limited (MRF.NS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRF.NSNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.30

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

3.97

-4.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

9.06

-9.78

MRF.NS vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRF.NS Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRF.NS and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRF.NSNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

1.80

-2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

1.42

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

1.51

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.86

-0.15

Drawdowns

MRF.NS vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRF.NS drawdown since its inception was -80.98%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -81.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRF.NS and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRF.NSNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.98%

-81.05%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.95%

-15.79%

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.79%

-37.08%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.79%

-63.08%

+31.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-63.08%

+27.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.15%

-13.64%

-9.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.72%

-27.24%

+10.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.41%

6.90%

+4.51%

Volatility

MRF.NS vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MRF Limited (MRF.NS) is 5.06%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.85%. This indicates that MRF.NS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRF.NSNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

13.85%

-8.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.96%

26.37%

-8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.32%

34.83%

-10.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

51.11%

-28.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.56%

49.22%

-23.66%

Dividends

MRF.NS vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

MRF.NS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRF.NS
MRF Limited
0.19%0.15%0.15%0.14%0.17%0.20%0.13%0.09%0.09%0.08%0.20%0.13%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

MRF.NS vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MRF Limited and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. MRF.NS values in INR, NVDA values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


MRF.NS and NVDA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRF.NS and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer