^NIFTY200 vs. TRENT.NS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NIFTY 200 (^NIFTY200) and Trent Limited (TRENT.NS).

Performance

^NIFTY200 vs. TRENT.NS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₹10,000 investment in NIFTY 200 (^NIFTY200) and Trent Limited (TRENT.NS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

^NIFTY200 vs. TRENT.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^NIFTY200 NIFTY 200	-12.48%	8.40%	13.63%	23.49%	3.65%	27.47%	15.62%	8.68%	-1.01%	33.43%
TRENT.NS Trent Limited	-17.59%	-39.88%	133.33%	126.40%	27.10%	54.99%	30.66%	45.92%	7.82%	68.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NIFTY200 achieves a -12.48% return, which is significantly higher than TRENT.NS's -17.59% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NIFTY200 has underperformed TRENT.NS with an annualized return of 12.14%, while TRENT.NS has yielded a comparatively higher 36.49% annualized return.

^NIFTY200

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: -8.69%
• YTD: -12.48%
• 6M: -8.19%
• 1Y: -0.69%
• 3Y*: 12.19%
• 5Y*: 10.35%
• 10Y*: 12.14%

TRENT.NS

• 1D: 6.90%
• 1M: -8.37%
• YTD: -17.59%
• 6M: -27.02%
• 1Y: -36.71%
• 3Y*: 37.02%
• 5Y*: 36.40%
• 10Y*: 36.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

^NIFTY200 vs. TRENT.NS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NIFTY200

^NIFTY200 Risk / Return Rank: 10
^NIFTY200 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
^NIFTY200 Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
^NIFTY200 Omega Ratio Rank: 11
^NIFTY200 Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
^NIFTY200 Martin Ratio Rank: 7

TRENT.NS

TRENT.NS Risk / Return Rank: 11
TRENT.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
TRENT.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
TRENT.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TRENT.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TRENT.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NIFTY200 vs. TRENT.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NIFTY 200 (^NIFTY200) and Trent Limited (TRENT.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^NIFTY200	TRENT.NS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	-1.03	+0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	-1.36	+1.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	0.81	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	-0.64	+0.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.78	-1.20	+0.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^NIFTY200 vs. TRENT.NS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NIFTY200 Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is higher than the TRENT.NS Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NIFTY200 and TRENT.NS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^NIFTY200	TRENT.NS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05	-1.03	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	1.09	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	1.04	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.36	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between ^NIFTY200 and TRENT.NS is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Drawdowns

^NIFTY200 vs. TRENT.NS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NIFTY200 drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, smaller than the maximum TRENT.NS drawdown of -91.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NIFTY200 and TRENT.NS.

Drawdown Indicators

	^NIFTY200	TRENT.NS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.04%	-91.01%	+26.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.89%	-46.99%	+32.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.15%	-59.91%	+41.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.22%	-59.91%	+21.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.99%	-57.14%	+43.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.98%	-32.47%	+21.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	25.15%	-21.55%

Volatility

^NIFTY200 vs. TRENT.NS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NIFTY 200 (^NIFTY200) is 7.86%, while Trent Limited (TRENT.NS) has a volatility of 13.22%. This indicates that ^NIFTY200 experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRENT.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^NIFTY200	TRENT.NS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.86%	13.22%	-5.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.66%	22.83%	-12.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.45%	36.58%	-22.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.32%	34.22%	-19.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	35.89%	-19.65%