PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRCP vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MRCP vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MRCP vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MRCP
PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March
-1.03%14.13%11.42%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.44%11.36%-0.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRCP achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly lower than TLTW's 1.44% return.


MRCP

1D
1.86%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
-1.03%
6M
1.61%
1Y
13.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.22%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
0.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MRCP vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRCP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MRCP vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRCP
MRCP Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MRCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRCP Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MRCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRCP Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRCP vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRCPTLTWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

0.84

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

1.17

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.15

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.42

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.54

3.74

+5.81

MRCP vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRCP Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRCP and TLTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRCPTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.84

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

-0.03

+1.27

Correlation

The correlation between MRCP and TLTW is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MRCP vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

MRCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%.


TTM2025202420232022
MRCP
PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
13.66%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Drawdowns

MRCP vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRCP drawdown since its inception was -10.73%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRCP and TLTW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MRCPTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-18.61%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-5.80%

-2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

-2.98%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.81%

-8.49%

+7.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

2.20%

-0.75%

Volatility

MRCP vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) have volatilities of 3.48% and 3.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MRCPTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.46%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.84%

5.80%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

8.91%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.48%

11.55%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.48%

11.55%

-2.07%