MRCP vs. COMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MRCP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MRCP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by PGIM, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MRCP returned 18.03% vs 47.51% for COMT. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. MRCP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.

Performance

MRCP vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRCP achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.

MRCP

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 7.27%
• 6M: 8.29%
• 1Y: 18.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 39.67%
• 6M: 39.06%
• 1Y: 47.51%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRCP vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MRCP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March	7.27%	14.13%	11.42%
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	39.67%	6.07%	2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MRCP and COMT is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2024	-0.02

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MRCP and COMT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.23, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

MRCP vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRCP

MRCP Risk / Return Rank: 87
MRCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MRCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MRCP Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MRCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
MRCP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

COMT

COMT Risk / Return Rank: 71
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRCP vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MRCP	COMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	2.24	+0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.29	2.88	+1.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.40	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	5.95	-2.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.57	14.11	+7.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MRCP vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRCP Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRCP and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MRCP	COMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91	2.24	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.60	0.20	+1.40

Drawdowns

MRCP vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRCP drawdown since its inception was -10.73%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRCP and COMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRCP	COMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.73%	-51.89%	+41.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.81%	-8.02%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-4.82%	+4.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-24.07%	+23.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	3.38%	-2.54%

Volatility

MRCP vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) is 1.36%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that MRCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRCP	COMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.36%	7.37%	-6.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.95%	18.80%	-13.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.24%	21.29%	-15.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.27%	21.06%	-11.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.27%	18.89%	-9.62%

MRCP vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRCP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

MRCP vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

MRCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	5.54%	7.74%	4.90%	5.19%	29.79%	17.79%	0.36%	2.61%	11.65%	5.16%	0.52%	1.44%
MRCP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRCP and COMT in my portfolio?

MRCP and COMT have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MRCP or COMT?

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to MRCP (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRCP dropped -10.73% vs COMT's -51.89%.

Which ETF is better, MRCP or COMT?

On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 47.51% vs 18.03% for MRCP. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, MRCP has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MRCP or COMT?

Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 47.51% return vs 18.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MRCP or COMT?

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MRCP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MRCP or COMT?

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for MRCP.

What is the main difference between MRCP and COMT?

MRCP is categorized as Options Trading, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MRCP and 0.48% for COMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MRCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.